PSL vs. SOXQ
PSL (Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSL is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSL returned 9.49%/yr vs 59.09%/yr for SOXQ. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
PSL vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSL achieves a 8.95% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 92.48% return.
PSL
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -2.89%
- YTD
- 8.95%
- 6M
- 9.19%
- 1Y
- -0.52%
- 3Y*
- 9.49%
- 5Y*
- 3.65%
- 10Y*
- 7.82%
SOXQ
- 1D
- -2.15%
- 1M
- 24.08%
- YTD
- 92.48%
- 6M
- 89.00%
- 1Y
- 171.59%
- 3Y*
- 59.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSL vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 8.95% | -3.47% | 15.42% | 12.32% | -7.76% | -3.80% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 92.48% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 24.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSL and SOXQ is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.38 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PSL and SOXQ has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PSL vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSL
SOXQ
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
PSL
SOXQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
PSL
SOXQ
-
Financial Services
PSL
SOXQ
Industrials
PSL
SOXQ
-
Basic Materials
PSL
-
SOXQ
-
Communication Services
PSL
-
SOXQ
-
Energy
PSL
-
SOXQ
-
Healthcare
PSL
-
SOXQ
-
Real Estate
PSL
-
SOXQ
-
Technology
PSL
-
SOXQ
Utilities
PSL
-
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSL vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
PSL
SOXQ
PSL vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSL | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.69 | -0.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 11.08 | -11.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.08 | 42.47 | -42.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSL | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 | 5.11 | -5.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.96 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
PSL vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSL drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, smaller than the maximum SOXQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSL and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSL | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.58% | -46.01% | +4.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.64% | -15.59% | +1.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.64% | -39.36% | +25.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.54% | -2.15% | -4.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.82% | -12.95% | +7.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.10% | 4.06% | +2.04% |
Volatility
PSL vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) is 3.08%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 13.55%. This indicates that PSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSL | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.08% | 13.55% | -10.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.50% | 26.81% | -18.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.76% | 33.80% | -21.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 36.38% | -21.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.49% | 36.38% | -19.89% |
PSL vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSL vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
PSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than SOXQ's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 0.84% | 0.93% | 0.60% | 1.37% | 1.98% | 1.24% | 0.80% | 0.47% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 2.08% | 1.18% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.26% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSL and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (13.55%) compared to PSL (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSL dropped -41.58% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 59.09% vs 9.49% for PSL. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, PSL has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 59.09% return vs 9.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PSL.
PSL has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.26% for SOXQ.
PSL is categorized as Momentum, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. PSL tracks DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PSL and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.11 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSL and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer