PSL vs. PTF
PSL (Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF) and PTF (Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Invesco - PSL tracks the DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index while PTF tracks the Dorsey Wright Technology Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSL returned 8.21%/yr vs 26.42%/yr for PTF. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
PSL vs. PTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSL achieves a 11.21% return, which is significantly lower than PTF's 65.59% return. Over the past 10 years, PSL has underperformed PTF with an annualized return of 8.21%, while PTF has yielded a comparatively higher 26.42% annualized return.
PSL
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 11.21%
- 6M
- 9.38%
- 1Y
- 1.20%
- 3Y*
- 9.94%
- 5Y*
- 4.59%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
PTF
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- 65.59%
- 6M
- 60.05%
- 1Y
- 88.63%
- 3Y*
- 40.09%
- 5Y*
- 20.80%
- 10Y*
- 26.42%
PSL vs. PTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 11.21% | -3.47% | 15.42% | 12.32% | -7.76% | 6.88% | 18.15% | 14.16% | 0.92% | 21.82% |
PTF Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF | 65.59% | 5.68% | 43.65% | 33.73% | -31.75% | 18.10% | 82.06% | 46.71% | 0.01% | 32.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSL and PTF is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PSL and PTF has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PSL vs. PTF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSL
PTF
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
PSL
PTF
-
Consumer Cyclical
PSL
PTF
-
Financial Services
PSL
PTF
Industrials
PSL
PTF
Basic Materials
PSL
-
PTF
-
Communication Services
PSL
-
PTF
Energy
PSL
-
PTF
Healthcare
PSL
-
PTF
-
Real Estate
PSL
-
PTF
-
Technology
PSL
-
PTF
Utilities
PSL
-
PTF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSL vs. PTF — Risk / Return Rank
PSL
PTF
PSL vs. PTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) and Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSL | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.35 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | 4.95 | -4.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.19 | 18.67 | -18.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSL vs. PTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSL drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, smaller than the maximum PTF drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSL and PTF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSL | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.58% | -55.38% | +13.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.64% | -17.99% | +4.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.64% | -36.11% | +22.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.45% | -44.88% | +25.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.67% | -44.88% | +10.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.60% | -8.46% | +3.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.81% | -13.25% | +7.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.20% | 4.76% | +1.44% |
Volatility
PSL vs. PTF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) is 4.44%, while Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a volatility of 17.81%. This indicates that PSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSL | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.44% | 17.81% | -13.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.20% | 31.89% | -22.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.11% | 41.43% | -28.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 35.60% | -20.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 33.29% | -16.78% |
PSL vs. PTF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PSL and PTF have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
PSL vs. PTF - Dividend Comparison
PSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, more than PTF's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 0.75% | 0.93% | 0.60% | 1.37% | 1.98% | 1.24% | 0.80% | 0.47% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 2.08% | 1.18% |
PTF Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.26% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSL and PTF have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTF has higher volatility (17.81%) compared to PSL (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSL dropped -41.58% vs PTF's -55.38%.
On 10-year performance, PTF leads with 26.42% vs 8.21% for PSL. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, PSL has been the lower-risk option at 4.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PTF has performed better with a 26.42% return vs 8.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSL and PTF have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
PSL has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.
PSL tracks DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index, while PTF tracks Dorsey Wright Technology Technical Leaders Index.
PTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSL and PTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer