PSK vs. EVPF
PSK (SPDR ICE Preferred Securities ETF) and EVPF (Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. PSK is passively managed, while EVPF is actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSK charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for EVPF.
Performance
PSK vs. EVPF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PSK
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- -0.09%
- 6M
- -0.18%
- 1Y
- 4.79%
- 3Y*
- 3.19%
- 5Y*
- -0.80%
- 10Y*
- 2.12%
EVPF
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSK vs. EVPF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PSK SPDR ICE Preferred Securities ETF | -2.22% |
EVPF Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF | 1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSK and EVPF is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2026 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSK vs. EVPF — Risk / Return Rank
PSK
EVPF
PSK vs. EVPF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR ICE Preferred Securities ETF (PSK) and Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF (EVPF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSK | EVPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.19 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.91 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSK | EVPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 1.13 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
PSK vs. EVPF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSK drawdown since its inception was -30.10%, which is greater than EVPF's maximum drawdown of -2.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSK and EVPF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSK | EVPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.10% | -2.36% | -27.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.51% | -0.18% | -5.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.98% | -0.52% | -3.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | — | — |
Volatility
PSK vs. EVPF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSK | EVPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.68% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.18% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.04% | 4.35% | +1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.72% | 4.35% | +6.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.91% | 4.35% | +7.56% |
PSK vs. EVPF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSK has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than EVPF's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSK vs. EVPF - Dividend Comparison
PSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.02%, more than EVPF's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVPF Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSK SPDR ICE Preferred Securities ETF | 7.02% | 6.82% | 6.55% | 6.44% | 6.55% | 5.03% | 5.08% | 5.44% | 6.47% | 6.91% | 5.92% | 5.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSK and EVPF have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EVPF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EVPF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PSK.
PSK has the higher dividend yield at 7.02%, compared with 1.08% for EVPF.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PSK and 0.39% for EVPF.
Find the right allocation for PSK and EVPF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer