PSIL vs. BTEC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PSIL (AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF) and BTEC (Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. PSIL is actively managed, while BTEC is passively managed. PSIL charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BTEC.

Performance

PSIL vs. BTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL) and Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PSIL

• 1D: -2.57%
• 1M: 1.88%
• YTD: 20.15%
• 6M: 23.74%
• 1Y: 65.52%
• 3Y*: 9.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTEC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSIL vs. BTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PSIL AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF	24.95%
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF	0.00%

PSIL vs. BTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSIL	BTEC
Healthcare	100.0%	99.4%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Industrials	-	0.6%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PSIL vs. BTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSIL

PSIL Risk / Return Rank: 48
PSIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
PSIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
PSIL Omega Ratio Rank: 43
PSIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
PSIL Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSIL vs. BTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL) and Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSIL	BTEC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.23	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.82	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSIL	BTEC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.42	—	—

Drawdowns

PSIL vs. BTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSIL drawdown since its inception was -92.72%, which is greater than BTEC's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSIL and BTEC.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSIL	BTEC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.72%	0.00%	-92.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-64.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-76.63%	0.00%	-76.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-76.76%	0.00%	-76.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.63%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PSIL	BTEC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.76%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.89%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.80%	0.00%	+41.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.15%	0.00%	+63.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.15%	0.00%	+63.15%

PSIL vs. BTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSIL has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BTEC's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSIL vs. BTEC - Dividend Comparison

PSIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.32%, while BTEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PSIL AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF	8.32%	10.95%	1.49%	0.24%	2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, PSIL or BTEC?

On fees, BTEC is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSIL or BTEC?

BTEC is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for PSIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSIL or BTEC?

PSIL has the higher dividend yield at 8.32%, compared with 0.00% for BTEC.

What is the main difference between PSIL and BTEC?

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Principal. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for PSIL and 0.42% for BTEC.