PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSIFX vs. PJFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSIFX vs. PJFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Quant Solutions Stock Index Fund (PSIFX) and PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSIFX achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly higher than PJFAX's 9.23% return. Over the past 10 years, PSIFX has underperformed PJFAX with an annualized return of 16.73%, while PJFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.29% annualized return.


PSIFX

1D
0.13%
1M
5.77%
YTD
11.59%
6M
11.59%
1Y
28.70%
3Y*
23.83%
5Y*
12.47%
10Y*
16.73%

PJFAX

1D
-0.63%
1M
7.66%
YTD
9.23%
6M
7.87%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
29.27%
5Y*
15.31%
10Y*
20.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSIFX vs. PJFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSIFX
PGIM Quant Solutions Stock Index Fund
11.59%17.59%28.87%26.03%-18.45%16.13%18.30%58.00%-5.01%21.61%
PJFAX
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund
9.23%14.53%48.10%52.76%-37.89%15.65%55.66%45.04%-1.24%36.41%

Correlation

The correlation between PSIFX and PJFAX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 1995

0.91

The correlation between PSIFX and PJFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSIFX vs. PJFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSIFX
PSIFX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PSIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
PSIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

PJFAX
PJFAX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PJFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PJFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSIFX vs. PJFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Quant Solutions Stock Index Fund (PSIFX) and PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSIFXPJFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.24

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

1.24

+2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.49

3.95

+11.54

PSIFX vs. PJFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSIFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the PJFAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSIFX and PJFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSIFXPJFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

1.35

+1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.62

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.85

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.52

+0.07

Drawdowns

PSIFX vs. PJFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSIFX drawdown since its inception was -55.36%, smaller than the maximum PJFAX drawdown of -64.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSIFX and PJFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSIFXPJFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.36%

-64.07%

+8.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-17.76%

+8.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.77%

-24.05%

+5.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.56%

-43.56%

+13.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.76%

-43.56%

+9.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.63%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.53%

-20.35%

+10.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

5.55%

-3.64%

Volatility

PSIFX vs. PJFAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Quant Solutions Stock Index Fund (PSIFX) is 2.82%, while PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) has a volatility of 3.85%. This indicates that PSIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PJFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSIFXPJFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

3.85%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.98%

12.34%

-3.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.87%

16.27%

-4.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.62%

24.70%

-7.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.59%

24.01%

-4.42%

PSIFX vs. PJFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSIFX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than PJFAX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSIFX vs. PJFAX - Dividend Comparison

PSIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.69%, less than PJFAX's 12.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PJFAX
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund
12.28%13.42%24.62%7.23%2.77%14.67%9.02%16.27%6.06%5.85%4.12%6.90%
PSIFX
PGIM Quant Solutions Stock Index Fund
7.69%8.58%7.80%13.52%16.37%1.12%28.17%34.50%23.67%6.19%3.87%3.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, PSIFX and PJFAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PJFAX has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to PSIFX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSIFX dropped -55.36% vs PJFAX's -64.07%.

PSIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSIFX and PJFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer