PSI vs. SEMI

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

PSI (Invesco Semiconductors ETF) and SEMI (Columbia Select Technology ETF) are both Semiconductors funds. PSI is passively managed, while SEMI is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSI returned 60.68%/yr vs 28.57%/yr for SEMI. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSI charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SEMI.

Performance

PSI vs. SEMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) and Columbia Select Technology ETF (SEMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSI achieves a 124.90% return, which is significantly higher than SEMI's 28.33% return.

PSI

• 1D: 5.08%
• 1M: 9.72%
• YTD: 124.90%
• 6M: 119.44%
• 1Y: 198.74%
• 3Y*: 60.68%
• 5Y*: 33.95%
• 10Y*: 36.46%

SEMI

• 1D: 2.14%
• 1M: 1.97%
• YTD: 28.33%
• 6M: 27.09%
• 1Y: 51.50%
• 3Y*: 28.57%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSI vs. SEMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF	124.90%	36.32%	17.17%	49.06%	-27.27%
SEMI Columbia Select Technology ETF	28.33%	24.91%	15.87%	45.37%	-23.94%

Correlation

The correlation between PSI and SEMI is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2022	0.91

The correlation between PSI and SEMI shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSI vs. SEMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSI	SEMI
Technology	98.4%	85.5%
Industrials	1.6%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	7.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	3.1%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PSI vs. SEMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSI

PSI Risk / Return Rank: 97
PSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
PSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
PSI Omega Ratio Rank: 94
PSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PSI Martin Ratio Rank: 98

SEMI

SEMI Risk / Return Rank: 73
SEMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
SEMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
SEMI Omega Ratio Rank: 68
SEMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
SEMI Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSI vs. SEMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) and Columbia Select Technology ETF (SEMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSI	SEMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.73	2.08	+2.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.37	2.61	+1.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.35	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	12.93	3.59	+9.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	44.51	12.83	+31.68

PSI vs. SEMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSI Sharpe Ratio is 4.73, which is higher than the SEMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSI and SEMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PSI vs. SEMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSI drawdown since its inception was -62.96%, which is greater than SEMI's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSI and SEMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSI	SEMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.96%	-33.46%	-29.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.48%	-14.41%	-1.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.07%	-32.93%	-8.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.86%	-3.46%	-0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.90%	-9.85%	-6.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.49%	4.03%	+0.46%

Volatility

PSI vs. SEMI - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) has a higher volatility of 21.87% compared to Columbia Select Technology ETF (SEMI) at 12.83%. This indicates that PSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSI	SEMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.87%	12.83%	+9.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.39%	20.55%	+14.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.27%	24.90%	+17.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.89%	31.91%	+6.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.63%	31.91%	+3.72%

PSI vs. SEMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSI has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than SEMI's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSI vs. SEMI - Dividend Comparison

PSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than SEMI's 3.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF	0.03%	0.10%	0.15%	0.40%	0.61%	0.14%	0.21%	0.52%	0.83%	0.21%	0.68%	0.16%
SEMI Columbia Select Technology ETF	3.49%	4.48%	0.96%	0.87%	0.67%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSI and SEMI in my portfolio?

PSI and SEMI have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSI or SEMI?

PSI has higher volatility (21.87%) compared to SEMI (12.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSI dropped -62.96% vs SEMI's -33.46%.

Which ETF is better, PSI or SEMI?

On 3-year performance, PSI leads with 60.68% vs 28.57% for SEMI. On fees, PSI is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, SEMI has been the lower-risk option at 12.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSI or SEMI?

Over the 3-year period, PSI has performed better with a 60.68% return vs 28.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSI or SEMI?

PSI is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SEMI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSI or SEMI?

SEMI has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 0.03% for PSI.

What is the main difference between PSI and SEMI?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Columbia. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PSI and 0.75% for SEMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.73 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.