PSI vs. PTF
PSI (Invesco Semiconductors ETF) and PTF (Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSI is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index, while PTF is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Technology Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSI returned 35.27%/yr vs 26.71%/yr for PTF. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSI charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PTF.
Performance
PSI vs. PTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSI achieves a 116.16% return, which is significantly higher than PTF's 69.43% return. Over the past 10 years, PSI has outperformed PTF with an annualized return of 35.27%, while PTF has yielded a comparatively lower 26.71% annualized return.
PSI
- 1D
- -7.60%
- 1M
- 10.87%
- YTD
- 116.16%
- 6M
- 110.97%
- 1Y
- 200.81%
- 3Y*
- 58.76%
- 5Y*
- 32.86%
- 10Y*
- 35.27%
PTF
- 1D
- -6.34%
- 1M
- 5.02%
- YTD
- 69.43%
- 6M
- 64.22%
- 1Y
- 96.10%
- 3Y*
- 41.16%
- 5Y*
- 21.25%
- 10Y*
- 26.71%
PSI vs. PTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 116.16% | 36.32% | 17.17% | 49.06% | -34.43% | 46.55% | 56.75% | 52.49% | -11.55% | 40.16% |
PTF Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF | 69.43% | 5.68% | 43.65% | 33.73% | -31.75% | 18.10% | 82.06% | 46.71% | 0.01% | 32.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSI and PTF is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006 | 0.82 |
The correlation between PSI and PTF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSI vs. PTF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSI
PTF
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
PSI
PTF
Industrials
PSI
PTF
Basic Materials
PSI
-
PTF
-
Communication Services
PSI
-
PTF
Consumer Cyclical
PSI
-
PTF
-
Consumer Defensive
PSI
-
PTF
-
Energy
PSI
-
PTF
Financial Services
PSI
-
PTF
Healthcare
PSI
-
PTF
-
Real Estate
PSI
-
PTF
-
Utilities
PSI
-
PTF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSI vs. PTF — Risk / Return Rank
PSI
PTF
PSI vs. PTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) and Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSI | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.37 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 13.06 | 5.37 | +7.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 45.36 | 20.37 | +24.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSI vs. PTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSI drawdown since its inception was -62.96%, which is greater than PTF's maximum drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSI and PTF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSI | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.96% | -55.38% | -7.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.48% | -17.99% | +2.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.07% | -36.11% | -4.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.85% | -44.88% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.85% | -44.88% | +0.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.60% | -6.34% | -1.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.90% | -13.25% | -2.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.45% | 4.73% | -0.28% |
Volatility
PSI vs. PTF - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) has a higher volatility of 21.88% compared to Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) at 17.66%. This indicates that PSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSI | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.88% | 17.66% | +4.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.15% | 32.05% | +3.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.19% | 41.37% | +0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.84% | 35.58% | +3.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.61% | 33.29% | +2.32% |
PSI vs. PTF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSI has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than PTF's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSI vs. PTF - Dividend Comparison
PSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, more than PTF's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 0.03% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.40% | 0.61% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.52% | 0.83% | 0.21% | 0.68% | 0.16% |
PTF Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.26% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSI and PTF have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSI has higher volatility (21.88%) compared to PTF (17.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSI dropped -62.96% vs PTF's -55.38%.
On 10-year performance, PSI leads with 35.27% vs 26.71% for PTF. On fees, PSI is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, PTF has been the lower-risk option at 17.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSI has performed better with a 35.27% return vs 26.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSI is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTF.
PSI has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.
PSI is categorized as Semiconductors, while PTF is Momentum. PSI tracks Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index, while PTF tracks Dorsey Wright Technology Technical Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PSI and 0.60% for PTF.
PSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.79 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSI and PTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer