PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSI vs. IGM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSI vs. IGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSI achieves a 112.38% return, which is significantly higher than IGM's 23.93% return. Over the past 10 years, PSI has outperformed IGM with an annualized return of 34.69%, while IGM has yielded a comparatively lower 24.72% annualized return.


PSI

1D
0.44%
1M
17.16%
YTD
112.38%
6M
121.38%
1Y
199.37%
3Y*
56.05%
5Y*
33.45%
10Y*
34.69%

IGM

1D
-0.68%
1M
4.68%
YTD
23.93%
6M
27.90%
1Y
49.62%
3Y*
35.04%
5Y*
20.05%
10Y*
24.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSI vs. IGM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSI
Invesco Semiconductors ETF
112.38%36.32%17.17%49.06%-34.43%46.55%56.75%52.49%-11.55%40.16%
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
23.93%26.76%36.99%60.68%-35.83%25.72%45.11%41.81%2.26%37.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PSI and IGM is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2005

0.83

The correlation between PSI and IGM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSI vs. IGM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSI
IGM

Technology

98.4%
85.2%

Industrials

1.6%
0.3%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.2%

Financial Services

-

0.3%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

PSI
98.4%
IGM
85.2%

Industrials

PSI
1.6%
IGM
0.3%

Basic Materials

PSI

-

IGM

-

Communication Services

PSI

-

IGM
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

PSI

-

IGM
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

PSI

-

IGM

-

Energy

PSI

-

IGM
0.2%

Financial Services

PSI

-

IGM
0.3%

Healthcare

PSI

-

IGM

-

Real Estate

PSI

-

IGM

-

Utilities

PSI

-

IGM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSI vs. IGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSI
PSI Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
PSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSI Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSI Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

IGM
IGM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGM Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
IGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGM Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSI vs. IGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSIIGMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.37

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.97

3.03

+9.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

45.30

10.21

+35.09

PSI vs. IGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSI Sharpe Ratio is 4.91, which is higher than the IGM Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSI and IGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSI vs. IGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSI drawdown since its inception was -62.96%, roughly equal to the maximum IGM drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSI and IGM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSIIGMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.96%

-65.59%

+2.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.48%

-16.44%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.07%

-26.39%

-14.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.85%

-40.68%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.85%

-40.68%

-4.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.62%

-6.42%

+1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.91%

-15.21%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.42%

4.88%

-0.46%

Volatility

PSI vs. IGM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) has a higher volatility of 19.35% compared to iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) at 10.71%. This indicates that PSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSIIGMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.35%

10.71%

+8.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.86%

18.29%

+15.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.92%

22.31%

+18.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.57%

25.98%

+12.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.49%

24.70%

+10.79%

PSI vs. IGM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSI has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than IGM's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSI vs. IGM - Dividend Comparison

PSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than IGM's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
0.14%0.17%0.22%0.33%0.66%0.16%0.32%0.50%0.57%0.57%0.90%0.79%
PSI
Invesco Semiconductors ETF
0.04%0.10%0.15%0.40%0.61%0.14%0.21%0.52%0.83%0.21%0.68%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSI and IGM have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSI has higher volatility (19.35%) compared to IGM (10.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSI dropped -62.96% vs IGM's -65.59%.

On 10-year performance, PSI leads with 34.69% vs 24.72% for IGM. On fees, IGM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IGM has been the lower-risk option at 10.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PSI has performed better with a 34.69% return vs 24.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PSI.

IGM has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.04% for PSI.

PSI is categorized as Semiconductors, while IGM is Technology Equities. PSI tracks Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index, while IGM tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PSI and 0.39% for IGM.

PSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.91 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSI and IGM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer