PSI vs. FYLD
PSI (Invesco Semiconductors ETF) and FYLD (Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSI is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index, while FYLD is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria. PSI is passively managed, while FYLD is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSI returned 34.59%/yr vs 12.08%/yr for FYLD. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSI charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FYLD.
Performance
PSI vs. FYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSI achieves a 112.90% return, which is significantly higher than FYLD's 19.96% return. Over the past 10 years, PSI has outperformed FYLD with an annualized return of 34.59%, while FYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.08% annualized return.
PSI
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- 10.45%
- YTD
- 112.90%
- 6M
- 110.54%
- 1Y
- 198.40%
- 3Y*
- 55.80%
- 5Y*
- 32.57%
- 10Y*
- 34.59%
FYLD
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 19.96%
- 6M
- 20.90%
- 1Y
- 38.49%
- 3Y*
- 22.16%
- 5Y*
- 11.63%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
PSI vs. FYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 112.90% | 36.32% | 17.17% | 49.06% | -34.43% | 46.55% | 56.75% | 52.49% | -11.55% | 40.16% |
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 19.96% | 34.53% | 3.00% | 13.18% | -5.53% | 18.67% | 4.17% | 17.83% | -14.47% | 29.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSI and FYLD is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2013 | 0.49 |
The correlation between PSI and FYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSI vs. FYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSI
FYLD
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
PSI
FYLD
Industrials
PSI
FYLD
Basic Materials
PSI
-
FYLD
Communication Services
PSI
-
FYLD
Consumer Cyclical
PSI
-
FYLD
Consumer Defensive
PSI
-
FYLD
Energy
PSI
-
FYLD
Financial Services
PSI
-
FYLD
Healthcare
PSI
-
FYLD
-
Real Estate
PSI
-
FYLD
-
Utilities
PSI
-
FYLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSI vs. FYLD — Risk / Return Rank
PSI
FYLD
PSI vs. FYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSI | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.58 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.90 | 7.11 | +5.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 45.29 | 25.06 | +20.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSI vs. FYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSI drawdown since its inception was -62.96%, which is greater than FYLD's maximum drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSI and FYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSI | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.96% | -44.55% | -18.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.48% | -5.44% | -10.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.07% | -15.15% | -25.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.85% | -25.12% | -19.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.85% | -44.55% | -0.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.33% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.92% | -8.81% | -7.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.40% | 1.54% | +2.86% |
Volatility
PSI vs. FYLD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) has a higher volatility of 18.89% compared to Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) at 3.71%. This indicates that PSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSI | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.89% | 3.71% | +15.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.67% | 9.21% | +24.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.58% | 11.82% | +28.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.44% | 16.27% | +22.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.42% | 18.01% | +17.41% |
PSI vs. FYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSI has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than FYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSI vs. FYLD - Dividend Comparison
PSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than FYLD's 3.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 3.60% | 4.07% | 5.41% | 6.06% | 6.13% | 4.74% | 3.94% | 3.73% | 5.17% | 2.85% | 2.72% | 3.98% |
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 0.04% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.40% | 0.61% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.52% | 0.83% | 0.21% | 0.68% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSI and FYLD have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSI has higher volatility (18.89%) compared to FYLD (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSI dropped -62.96% vs FYLD's -44.55%.
On 10-year performance, PSI leads with 34.59% vs 12.08% for FYLD. On fees, PSI is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, FYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSI has performed better with a 34.59% return vs 12.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSI is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FYLD.
FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 0.04% for PSI.
PSI is categorized as Semiconductors, while FYLD is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PSI and 0.59% for FYLD.
PSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.92 vs 3.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSI and FYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer