PSI vs. EWY
PSI (Invesco Semiconductors ETF) and EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSI is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index, while EWY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSI returned 34.59%/yr vs 16.84%/yr for EWY. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSI charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EWY.
Performance
PSI vs. EWY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSI achieves a 112.90% return, which is significantly higher than EWY's 103.10% return. Over the past 10 years, PSI has outperformed EWY with an annualized return of 34.59%, while EWY has yielded a comparatively lower 16.84% annualized return.
PSI
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- 10.45%
- YTD
- 112.90%
- 6M
- 110.54%
- 1Y
- 198.40%
- 3Y*
- 55.80%
- 5Y*
- 32.57%
- 10Y*
- 34.59%
EWY
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 103.10%
- 6M
- 117.85%
- 1Y
- 198.25%
- 3Y*
- 46.46%
- 5Y*
- 18.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.84%
PSI vs. EWY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 112.90% | 36.32% | 17.17% | 49.06% | -34.43% | 46.55% | 56.75% | 52.49% | -11.55% | 40.16% |
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 103.10% | 95.33% | -20.48% | 19.05% | -26.59% | -7.58% | 39.43% | 7.97% | -20.37% | 44.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSI and EWY is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2005 | 0.57 |
The correlation between PSI and EWY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSI vs. EWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSI
EWY
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
PSI
EWY
Industrials
PSI
EWY
Basic Materials
PSI
-
EWY
Communication Services
PSI
-
EWY
Consumer Cyclical
PSI
-
EWY
Consumer Defensive
PSI
-
EWY
Energy
PSI
-
EWY
Financial Services
PSI
-
EWY
Healthcare
PSI
-
EWY
Real Estate
PSI
-
EWY
-
Utilities
PSI
-
EWY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSI vs. EWY — Risk / Return Rank
PSI
EWY
PSI vs. EWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSI | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.59 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.90 | 8.65 | +4.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 45.29 | 30.24 | +15.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSI vs. EWY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSI drawdown since its inception was -62.96%, smaller than the maximum EWY drawdown of -74.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSI and EWY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSI | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.96% | -74.14% | +11.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.48% | -23.08% | +7.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.07% | -27.36% | -13.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.85% | -48.55% | +3.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.85% | -49.73% | +4.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -8.88% | +8.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.92% | -20.11% | +4.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.40% | 6.59% | -2.19% |
Volatility
PSI vs. EWY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) is 18.89%, while iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a volatility of 25.64%. This indicates that PSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSI | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.89% | 25.64% | -6.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.67% | 42.65% | -8.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.58% | 46.51% | -5.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.44% | 30.15% | +8.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.42% | 28.06% | +7.36% |
PSI vs. EWY - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSI has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than EWY's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSI vs. EWY - Dividend Comparison
PSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than EWY's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.03% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 0.04% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.40% | 0.61% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.52% | 0.83% | 0.21% | 0.68% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSI and EWY have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (25.64%) compared to PSI (18.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSI dropped -62.96% vs EWY's -74.14%.
On 10-year performance, PSI leads with 34.59% vs 16.84% for EWY. On fees, PSI is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, PSI has been the lower-risk option at 18.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSI has performed better with a 34.59% return vs 16.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSI is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWY.
EWY has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.04% for PSI.
PSI is categorized as Semiconductors, while EWY is Asia Pacific Equities. PSI tracks Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index, while EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PSI and 0.59% for EWY.
PSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.92 vs 4.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSI and EWY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer