PSI vs. CHPS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PSI (Invesco Semiconductors ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both Semiconductors funds - PSI tracks the Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index while CHPS tracks the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PSI returned 200.81% vs 199.74% for CHPS. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSI charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.

Performance

PSI vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSI achieves a 116.16% return, which is significantly higher than CHPS's 107.68% return.

PSI

• 1D: -7.60%
• 1M: 10.87%
• YTD: 116.16%
• 6M: 110.97%
• 1Y: 200.81%
• 3Y*: 58.76%
• 5Y*: 32.86%
• 10Y*: 35.27%

CHPS

• 1D: -8.79%
• 1M: 14.08%
• YTD: 107.68%
• 6M: 109.36%
• 1Y: 199.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSI vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF	116.16%	36.32%	17.17%	8.96%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	107.68%	58.47%	7.75%	10.88%

Correlation

The correlation between PSI and CHPS is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023	0.94

The correlation between PSI and CHPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSI vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSI	CHPS
Technology	98.4%	99.6%
Industrials	1.6%	0.4%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Energy	-	0.6%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PSI vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSI

PSI Risk / Return Rank: 96
PSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
PSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
PSI Omega Ratio Rank: 93
PSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PSI Martin Ratio Rank: 97

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 96
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSI vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSI	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.79	5.05	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.40	4.70	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.66	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	13.06	11.49	+1.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	45.36	42.41	+2.96

PSI vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSI Sharpe Ratio is 4.79, which is comparable to the CHPS Sharpe Ratio of 5.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSI and CHPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PSI vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSI drawdown since its inception was -62.96%, which is greater than CHPS's maximum drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSI and CHPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSI	CHPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.96%	-39.44%	-23.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.48%	-17.50%	+2.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.60%	-8.79%	+1.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.90%	-9.08%	-6.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.45%	4.73%	-0.28%

Volatility

PSI vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) have volatilities of 21.88% and 22.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSI	CHPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.88%	22.65%	-0.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.15%	34.27%	+0.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.19%	39.81%	+2.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.84%	35.53%	+3.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.61%	35.53%	+0.08%

PSI vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSI has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSI vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

PSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than CHPS's 0.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.31%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF	0.03%	0.10%	0.15%	0.40%	0.61%	0.14%	0.21%	0.52%	0.83%	0.21%	0.68%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSI and CHPS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, PSI and CHPS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PSI or CHPS?

CHPS has higher volatility (22.65%) compared to PSI (21.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSI dropped -62.96% vs CHPS's -39.44%.

Which ETF is better, PSI or CHPS?

On 1-year performance, PSI leads with 200.81% vs 199.74% for CHPS. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PSI has been the lower-risk option at 21.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSI or CHPS?

Over the 1-year period, PSI has performed better with a 200.81% return vs 199.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSI or CHPS?

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PSI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSI or CHPS?

CHPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.03% for PSI.

What is the main difference between PSI and CHPS?

PSI tracks Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PSI and 0.15% for CHPS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 4.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.