PSH vs. LDRH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PSH (PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF) and LDRH (iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. PSH is actively managed, while LDRH is passively managed. Over the past year, PSH returned 6.11% vs 6.43% for LDRH. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSH charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for LDRH.

Performance

PSH vs. LDRH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PSH having a 1.88% return and LDRH slightly lower at 1.79%.

PSH

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 1.88%
• 6M: 2.38%
• 1Y: 6.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LDRH

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 1.79%
• 6M: 2.28%
• 1Y: 6.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSH vs. LDRH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PSH PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF	1.88%	7.34%	0.16%
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF	1.79%	7.18%	0.21%

Correlation

The correlation between PSH and LDRH is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2024	0.72

The correlation between PSH and LDRH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSH vs. LDRH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSH	LDRH
Financial Services	1.3%	-
Energy	0.1%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PSH vs. LDRH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSH

PSH Risk / Return Rank: 71
PSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
PSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
PSH Omega Ratio Rank: 72
PSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
PSH Martin Ratio Rank: 69

LDRH

LDRH Risk / Return Rank: 85
LDRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
LDRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
LDRH Omega Ratio Rank: 81
LDRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
LDRH Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSH vs. LDRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSH	LDRH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	2.48	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.19	3.99	-0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.49	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.33	5.24	-0.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.80	21.81	-9.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSH vs. LDRH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSH Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the LDRH Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSH and LDRH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSH	LDRH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.04	2.48	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.21	1.69	+0.52

Drawdowns

PSH vs. LDRH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSH drawdown since its inception was -3.06%, roughly equal to the maximum LDRH drawdown of -3.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSH and LDRH.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSH	LDRH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.06%	-3.17%	+0.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.42%	-1.23%	-0.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.16%	-0.20%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.27%	-0.24%	-0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.48%	0.30%	+0.18%

Volatility

PSH vs. LDRH - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH) have volatilities of 0.69% and 0.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSH	LDRH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.69%	0.69%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.10%	1.97%	+0.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.02%	2.61%	+0.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.26%	3.52%	-0.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.26%	3.52%	-0.26%

PSH vs. LDRH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSH has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LDRH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSH vs. LDRH - Dividend Comparison

PSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%, less than LDRH's 7.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF	7.00%	6.41%	1.13%
PSH PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF	6.66%	6.62%	8.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSH and LDRH in my portfolio?

PSH and LDRH have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSH or LDRH?

LDRH has higher volatility (0.69%) compared to PSH (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSH dropped -3.06% vs LDRH's -3.17%.

Which ETF is better, PSH or LDRH?

On 1-year performance, LDRH leads with 6.43% vs 6.11% for PSH. On fees, LDRH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSH or LDRH?

Over the 1-year period, LDRH has performed better with a 6.43% return vs 6.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSH or LDRH?

LDRH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PSH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSH or LDRH?

LDRH has the higher dividend yield at 7.00%, compared with 6.66% for PSH.

What is the main difference between PSH and LDRH?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PSH and 0.35% for LDRH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LDRH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.