PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSH vs. FSCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PSH vs. FSCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH) and FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PSH vs. FSCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PSH
PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF
0.41%7.34%7.96%0.38%
FSCO
FS Credit Opportunities Corp.
-16.30%3.68%34.88%-1.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSH achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly higher than FSCO's -16.30% return.


PSH

1D
1.05%
1M
0.01%
YTD
0.41%
6M
1.51%
1Y
6.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FSCO

1D
0.79%
1M
3.57%
YTD
-16.30%
6M
-21.20%
1Y
-18.33%
3Y*
18.10%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSH vs. FSCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSH
PSH Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSH Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSH Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FSCO
FSCO Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FSCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCO Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSH vs. FSCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH) and FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSHFSCODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

-0.59

+2.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.42

-0.63

+3.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

0.91

+0.47

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

-0.52

+2.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.56

-1.42

+11.98

PSH vs. FSCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSH Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the FSCO Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSH and FSCO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSHFSCODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

-0.59

+2.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.16

0.62

+1.53

Correlation

The correlation between PSH and FSCO is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PSH vs. FSCO - Dividend Comparison

PSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.61%, less than FSCO's 15.64% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
PSH
PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF
7.61%6.62%8.35%0.00%0.00%
FSCO
FS Credit Opportunities Corp.
15.64%12.65%10.47%11.26%1.95%

Drawdowns

PSH vs. FSCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSH drawdown since its inception was -3.06%, smaller than the maximum FSCO drawdown of -35.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSH and FSCO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PSHFSCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.06%

-35.53%

+32.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.84%

-35.53%

+32.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-26.92%

+26.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.27%

-6.86%

+6.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.61%

13.06%

-12.45%

Volatility

PSH vs. FSCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH) is 1.55%, while FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO) has a volatility of 16.64%. This indicates that PSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PSHFSCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.55%

16.64%

-15.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.98%

24.82%

-22.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.93%

31.41%

-27.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.30%

28.10%

-24.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.30%

28.10%

-24.80%