PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSFO vs. SRVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSFO vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF (PSFO) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSFO achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly lower than SRVR's 19.79% return.


PSFO

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.42%
YTD
6.62%
6M
7.21%
1Y
17.64%
3Y*
13.19%
5Y*
10Y*

SRVR

1D
-1.79%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
19.79%
6M
20.69%
1Y
11.19%
3Y*
8.85%
5Y*
-0.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSFO vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PSFO
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF
6.62%12.93%10.78%20.03%-0.34%4.75%
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF
19.79%-1.99%2.70%6.84%-31.90%10.90%

Correlation

The correlation between PSFO and SRVR is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2021

0.60

The correlation between PSFO and SRVR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSFO vs. SRVR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSFO
SRVR

Technology

36.2%
6.8%

Financial Services

11.9%
0.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

8.1%
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%
3.8%

Utilities

2.3%
2.2%

Real Estate

1.9%
66.4%

Basic Materials

1.8%
0.8%

Technology

PSFO
36.2%
SRVR
6.8%

Financial Services

PSFO
11.9%
SRVR
0.9%

Communication Services

PSFO
10.9%
SRVR
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

PSFO
10.1%
SRVR

-

Healthcare

PSFO
8.4%
SRVR

-

Industrials

PSFO
8.1%
SRVR
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

PSFO
4.9%
SRVR

-

Energy

PSFO
3.5%
SRVR
3.8%

Utilities

PSFO
2.3%
SRVR
2.2%

Real Estate

PSFO
1.9%
SRVR
66.4%

Basic Materials

PSFO
1.8%
SRVR
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSFO vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSFO
PSFO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
PSFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSFO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PSFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSFO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SRVR
SRVR Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
SRVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRVR Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SRVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRVR Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSFO vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF (PSFO) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSFOSRVRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.13

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

0.76

+2.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.51

1.64

+14.87

PSFO vs. SRVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSFO Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the SRVR Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSFO and SRVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSFOSRVRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

0.67

+1.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.16

0.30

+0.86

Drawdowns

PSFO vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSFO drawdown since its inception was -12.09%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFO and SRVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSFOSRVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.09%

-40.99%

+28.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.20%

-14.78%

+9.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.09%

-18.34%

+6.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-12.28%

+12.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.75%

-15.27%

+13.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

6.83%

-5.76%

Volatility

PSFO vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF (PSFO) is 1.05%, while Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that PSFO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSFOSRVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

5.47%

-4.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.49%

13.12%

-7.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.29%

16.72%

-9.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.05%

19.71%

-9.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.05%

21.44%

-11.39%

PSFO vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PSFO and SRVR have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

PSFO vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison

PSFO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SRVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PSFO
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF
2.70%2.67%2.00%3.69%1.70%1.19%1.59%1.61%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSFO and SRVR have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SRVR has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to PSFO (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSFO dropped -12.09% vs SRVR's -40.99%.

On 3-year performance, PSFO leads with 13.19% vs 8.85% for SRVR. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, PSFO has been the lower-risk option at 1.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PSFO has performed better with a 13.19% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSFO and SRVR have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 0.00% for PSFO.

PSFO is categorized as Options Trading, while SRVR is REIT.

PSFO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSFO and SRVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer