PSFO vs. JULQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PSFO (Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF) and JULQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. PSFO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for JULQ.

Performance

PSFO vs. JULQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF (PSFO) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PSFO

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 2.42%
• YTD: 6.62%
• 6M: 7.21%
• 1Y: 17.64%
• 3Y*: 13.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JULQ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSFO vs. JULQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PSFO Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF	5.77%
JULQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July	0.00%

PSFO vs. JULQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSFO	JULQ
Technology	36.2%	31.7%
Financial Services	11.9%	14.0%
Communication Services	10.9%	9.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.4%
Healthcare	8.4%	10.9%
Industrials	8.1%	7.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	6.2%
Energy	3.5%	3.2%
Utilities	2.3%	2.6%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.3%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

PSFO vs. JULQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSFO

PSFO Risk / Return Rank: 77
PSFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
PSFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
PSFO Omega Ratio Rank: 80
PSFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
PSFO Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSFO vs. JULQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF (PSFO) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSFO	JULQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.43	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.54	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.41	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.51	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSFO	JULQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.16	—	—

Drawdowns

PSFO vs. JULQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSFO drawdown since its inception was -12.09%, which is greater than JULQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFO and JULQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSFO	JULQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.09%	0.00%	-12.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.20%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.09%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	0.00%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.75%	0.00%	-1.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.07%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PSFO	JULQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.05%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.49%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.29%	0.00%	+7.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.05%	0.00%	+10.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.05%	0.00%	+10.05%

PSFO vs. JULQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSFO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than JULQ's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSFO vs. JULQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither PSFO nor JULQ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, PSFO or JULQ?

On fees, PSFO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSFO or JULQ?

PSFO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JULQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSFO or JULQ?

PSFO and JULQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between PSFO and JULQ?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PSFO and 0.79% for JULQ.