PSFM vs. CLIP

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

PSFM (Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF) and CLIP (Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSFM is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Pacer, while CLIP is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index - USD. PSFM is actively managed, while CLIP is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSFM returned 12.78%/yr vs 4.64%/yr for CLIP. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. PSFM charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CLIP.

Performance

PSFM vs. CLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF (PSFM) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSFM achieves a 8.63% return, which is significantly higher than CLIP's 1.72% return.

PSFM

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 8.63%
• 6M: 8.52%
• 1Y: 15.33%
• 3Y*: 12.78%
• 5Y*: 9.64%
• 10Y*: —

CLIP

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 1.72%
• 6M: 1.78%
• 1Y: 3.95%
• 3Y*: 4.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSFM vs. CLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PSFM Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF	8.63%	7.28%	14.18%	7.29%
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	1.72%	4.23%	5.26%	2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between PSFM and CLIP is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2023	-0.00

Return for Risk

PSFM vs. CLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSFM

PSFM Risk / Return Rank: 97
PSFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
PSFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
PSFM Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PSFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
PSFM Martin Ratio Rank: 98

CLIP

CLIP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSFM vs. CLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF (PSFM) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSFM	CLIP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.77	17.84	-14.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.36	80.86	-74.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.86	26.35	-24.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.41	141.67	-131.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	51.71	1,281.30	-1,229.59

PSFM vs. CLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSFM Sharpe Ratio is 3.77, which is lower than the CLIP Sharpe Ratio of 17.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSFM and CLIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PSFM vs. CLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSFM drawdown since its inception was -14.33%, which is greater than CLIP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFM and CLIP.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSFM	CLIP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.33%	-0.08%	-14.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.48%	-0.03%	-1.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.12%	-0.08%	-14.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.83%	0.00%	-0.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.25%	-0.00%	-2.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.30%	0.00%	+0.30%

Volatility

PSFM vs. CLIP - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF (PSFM) has a higher volatility of 1.74% compared to Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP) at 0.06%. This indicates that PSFM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSFM	CLIP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.74%	0.06%	+1.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.29%	0.15%	+3.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.13%	0.22%	+3.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.58%	0.44%	+10.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.48%	0.44%	+10.04%

PSFM vs. CLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSFM has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than CLIP's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSFM vs. CLIP - Dividend Comparison

PSFM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	3.90%	4.14%	5.11%	2.75%
PSFM Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSFM and CLIP in my portfolio?

PSFM and CLIP have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSFM or CLIP?

PSFM has higher volatility (1.74%) compared to CLIP (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSFM dropped -14.33% vs CLIP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, PSFM or CLIP?

On 3-year performance, PSFM leads with 12.78% vs 4.64% for CLIP. On fees, CLIP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, CLIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSFM or CLIP?

Over the 3-year period, PSFM has performed better with a 12.78% return vs 4.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSFM or CLIP?

CLIP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PSFM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSFM or CLIP?

CLIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 0.00% for PSFM.

What is the main difference between PSFM and CLIP?

PSFM is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CLIP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PSFM and 0.07% for CLIP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.84 vs 3.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.