PSFJ vs. CALF
PSFJ (Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF) and CALF (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSFJ is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Pacer, while CALF is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. PSFJ is actively managed, while CALF is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSFJ returned 15.35%/yr vs 10.69%/yr for CALF. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSFJ charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for CALF.
Performance
PSFJ vs. CALF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSFJ achieves a 5.52% return, which is significantly lower than CALF's 13.34% return.
PSFJ
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 5.52%
- 6M
- 6.21%
- 1Y
- 17.26%
- 3Y*
- 15.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CALF
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 13.34%
- 6M
- 12.53%
- 1Y
- 30.24%
- 3Y*
- 10.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- —
PSFJ vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSFJ Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF | 5.52% | 13.75% | 16.08% | 20.25% | -3.81% | 5.37% |
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 13.34% | 2.33% | -7.41% | 35.43% | -15.20% | -2.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSFJ and CALF is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021 | 0.67 |
The correlation between PSFJ and CALF shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSFJ vs. CALF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSFJ
CALF
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PSFJ
CALF
Financial Services
PSFJ
CALF
Communication Services
PSFJ
CALF
Consumer Cyclical
PSFJ
CALF
Healthcare
PSFJ
CALF
Industrials
PSFJ
CALF
Consumer Defensive
PSFJ
CALF
Energy
PSFJ
CALF
Utilities
PSFJ
CALF
-
Real Estate
PSFJ
CALF
Basic Materials
PSFJ
CALF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSFJ vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank
PSFJ
CALF
PSFJ vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF (PSFJ) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSFJ | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.34 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.80 | 4.94 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.28 | 14.08 | +6.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSFJ | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65 | 1.93 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.37 | +0.73 |
Drawdowns
PSFJ vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSFJ drawdown since its inception was -12.20%, smaller than the maximum CALF drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFJ and CALF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSFJ | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.20% | -47.58% | +35.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.56% | -6.15% | +1.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.20% | -34.22% | +22.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -1.95% | +1.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.78% | -10.74% | +8.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 2.15% | -1.30% |
Volatility
PSFJ vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF (PSFJ) is 0.57%, while Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) has a volatility of 4.92%. This indicates that PSFJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CALF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSFJ | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.57% | 4.92% | -4.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.61% | 10.47% | -5.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.55% | 15.84% | -9.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.36% | 23.44% | -13.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.36% | 26.02% | -15.66% |
PSFJ vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSFJ has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSFJ vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison
PSFJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CALF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 2.63% | 0.82% | 0.99% | 1.39% | 0.70% |
PSFJ Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSFJ and CALF have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CALF has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to PSFJ (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSFJ dropped -12.20% vs CALF's -47.58%.
On 3-year performance, PSFJ leads with 15.35% vs 10.69% for CALF. On fees, CALF is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, PSFJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PSFJ has performed better with a 15.35% return vs 10.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CALF is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PSFJ.
CALF has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.00% for PSFJ.
PSFJ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CALF is Small Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PSFJ and 0.59% for CALF.
PSFJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSFJ and CALF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer