PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSFJ vs. CALF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSFJ vs. CALF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF (PSFJ) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSFJ achieves a 5.52% return, which is significantly lower than CALF's 13.34% return.


PSFJ

1D
-0.01%
1M
1.64%
YTD
5.52%
6M
6.21%
1Y
17.26%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
10Y*

CALF

1D
-1.12%
1M
4.91%
YTD
13.34%
6M
12.53%
1Y
30.24%
3Y*
10.69%
5Y*
4.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSFJ vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PSFJ
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF
5.52%13.75%16.08%20.25%-3.81%5.37%
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
13.34%2.33%-7.41%35.43%-15.20%-2.59%

Correlation

The correlation between PSFJ and CALF is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021

0.67

The correlation between PSFJ and CALF shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSFJ vs. CALF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSFJ
CALF

Technology

36.2%
29.7%

Financial Services

11.9%
0.2%

Communication Services

10.9%
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
28.3%

Healthcare

8.4%
9.4%

Industrials

8.1%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.3%

Energy

3.5%
10.3%

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%
1.6%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.6%

Technology

PSFJ
36.2%
CALF
29.7%

Financial Services

PSFJ
11.9%
CALF
0.2%

Communication Services

PSFJ
10.9%
CALF
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

PSFJ
10.1%
CALF
28.3%

Healthcare

PSFJ
8.4%
CALF
9.4%

Industrials

PSFJ
8.1%
CALF
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

PSFJ
4.9%
CALF
4.3%

Energy

PSFJ
3.5%
CALF
10.3%

Utilities

PSFJ
2.3%
CALF

-

Real Estate

PSFJ
1.9%
CALF
1.6%

Basic Materials

PSFJ
1.8%
CALF
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSFJ vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSFJ
PSFJ Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PSFJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSFJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSFJ Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PSFJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSFJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

CALF
CALF Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CALF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CALF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CALF Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CALF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CALF Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSFJ vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF (PSFJ) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSFJCALFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.34

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.80

4.94

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.28

14.08

+6.20

PSFJ vs. CALF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSFJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the CALF Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSFJ and CALF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSFJCALFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

1.93

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.37

+0.73

Drawdowns

PSFJ vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSFJ drawdown since its inception was -12.20%, smaller than the maximum CALF drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFJ and CALF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSFJCALFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.20%

-47.58%

+35.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.56%

-6.15%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.20%

-34.22%

+22.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-1.95%

+1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.78%

-10.74%

+8.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

2.15%

-1.30%

Volatility

PSFJ vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF (PSFJ) is 0.57%, while Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) has a volatility of 4.92%. This indicates that PSFJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CALF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSFJCALFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.57%

4.92%

-4.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.61%

10.47%

-5.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.55%

15.84%

-9.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.36%

23.44%

-13.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.36%

26.02%

-15.66%

PSFJ vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSFJ has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSFJ vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison

PSFJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CALF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.28%1.43%1.07%1.18%0.85%2.63%0.82%0.99%1.39%0.70%
PSFJ
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSFJ and CALF have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CALF has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to PSFJ (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSFJ dropped -12.20% vs CALF's -47.58%.

On 3-year performance, PSFJ leads with 15.35% vs 10.69% for CALF. On fees, CALF is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, PSFJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PSFJ has performed better with a 15.35% return vs 10.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CALF is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PSFJ.

CALF has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.00% for PSFJ.

PSFJ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CALF is Small Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PSFJ and 0.59% for CALF.

PSFJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSFJ and CALF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer