PSFD vs. TRFK

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PSFD (Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF) and TRFK (Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSFD is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Pacer, while TRFK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net. PSFD is actively managed, while TRFK is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSFD returned 14.12%/yr vs 50.88%/yr for TRFK. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSFD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for TRFK.

Performance

PSFD vs. TRFK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSFD achieves a 5.64% return, which is significantly lower than TRFK's 61.41% return.

PSFD

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: -0.17%
• YTD: 5.64%
• 6M: 5.57%
• 1Y: 15.94%
• 3Y*: 14.12%
• 5Y*: 11.39%
• 10Y*: —

TRFK

• 1D: -6.99%
• 1M: 9.38%
• YTD: 61.41%
• 6M: 59.46%
• 1Y: 85.46%
• 3Y*: 50.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSFD vs. TRFK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
PSFD Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF	5.64%	12.93%	14.54%	20.95%	5.19%
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF	61.41%	26.81%	38.30%	66.63%	-10.61%

Correlation

The correlation between PSFD and TRFK is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2022	0.78

The correlation between PSFD and TRFK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSFD vs. TRFK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSFD	TRFK
Technology	39.0%	87.5%
Financial Services	11.1%	-
Communication Services	10.6%	0.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	-
Healthcare	8.3%	-
Industrials	7.8%	12.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	-
Energy	3.1%	-
Utilities	2.1%	-
Real Estate	1.8%	0.0%
Basic Materials	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

PSFD vs. TRFK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSFD

PSFD Risk / Return Rank: 76
PSFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
PSFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
PSFD Omega Ratio Rank: 84
PSFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
PSFD Martin Ratio Rank: 77

TRFK

TRFK Risk / Return Rank: 76
TRFK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
TRFK Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
TRFK Omega Ratio Rank: 75
TRFK Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
TRFK Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSFD vs. TRFK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSFD	TRFK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	2.69	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.36	3.14	+0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.42	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.72	4.39	-1.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.72	10.31	+3.41

PSFD vs. TRFK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSFD Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the TRFK Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSFD and TRFK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PSFD vs. TRFK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSFD drawdown since its inception was -14.94%, smaller than the maximum TRFK drawdown of -29.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFD and TRFK.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSFD	TRFK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.94%	-29.06%	+14.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.88%	-19.56%	+13.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.26%	-29.06%	+16.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.99%	-6.99%	+6.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.00%	-6.04%	+4.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.16%	8.32%	-7.16%

Volatility

PSFD vs. TRFK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD) is 2.28%, while Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) has a volatility of 18.36%. This indicates that PSFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRFK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSFD	TRFK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.28%	18.36%	-16.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.98%	26.50%	-20.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.98%	32.01%	-25.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.51%	29.84%	-19.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.42%	29.84%	-19.42%

PSFD vs. TRFK - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSFD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TRFK's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSFD vs. TRFK - Dividend Comparison

PSFD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
PSFD Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.40%	0.20%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSFD and TRFK in my portfolio?

PSFD and TRFK have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSFD or TRFK?

TRFK has higher volatility (18.36%) compared to PSFD (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSFD dropped -14.94% vs TRFK's -29.06%.

Which ETF is better, PSFD or TRFK?

On 3-year performance, TRFK leads with 50.88% vs 14.12% for PSFD. On fees, TRFK is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PSFD has been the lower-risk option at 2.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSFD or TRFK?

Over the 3-year period, TRFK has performed better with a 50.88% return vs 14.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSFD or TRFK?

TRFK is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSFD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSFD or TRFK?

TRFK has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for PSFD.

What is the main difference between PSFD and TRFK?

PSFD is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TRFK is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PSFD and 0.60% for TRFK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRFK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.