PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSFD vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSFD vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSFD achieves a 6.48% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 11.25% return.


PSFD

1D
-0.20%
1M
2.53%
YTD
6.48%
6M
7.36%
1Y
17.61%
3Y*
14.92%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*

ITOT

1D
-0.73%
1M
5.01%
YTD
11.25%
6M
11.12%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
22.09%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSFD vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PSFD
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF
6.48%12.93%14.54%20.95%-3.06%18.23%1.33%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
11.25%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%25.68%1.02%

Correlation

The correlation between PSFD and ITOT is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2020

0.94

The correlation between PSFD and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSFD vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSFD
ITOT

Technology

36.2%
33.8%

Financial Services

11.9%
12.1%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
9.0%

Industrials

8.1%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.7%

Energy

3.5%
3.7%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.1%

Technology

PSFD
36.2%
ITOT
33.8%

Financial Services

PSFD
11.9%
ITOT
12.1%

Communication Services

PSFD
10.9%
ITOT
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

PSFD
10.1%
ITOT
10.1%

Healthcare

PSFD
8.4%
ITOT
9.0%

Industrials

PSFD
8.1%
ITOT
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

PSFD
4.9%
ITOT
4.7%

Energy

PSFD
3.5%
ITOT
3.7%

Utilities

PSFD
2.3%
ITOT
2.3%

Real Estate

PSFD
1.9%
ITOT
2.4%

Basic Materials

PSFD
1.8%
ITOT
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSFD vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSFD
PSFD Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PSFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSFD Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PSFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSFD Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSFD vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSFDITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.42

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

3.17

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.39

14.57

+0.82

PSFD vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSFD Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSFD and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSFDITOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

2.32

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.13

0.74

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

0.57

+0.67

Drawdowns

PSFD vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSFD drawdown since its inception was -14.94%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFD and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSFDITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.94%

-55.20%

+40.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.88%

-8.90%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.26%

-19.44%

+7.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.94%

-25.36%

+10.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.73%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.01%

-6.97%

+4.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

1.94%

-0.79%

Volatility

PSFD vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD) is 1.08%, while iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) has a volatility of 2.99%. This indicates that PSFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSFDITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

2.99%

-1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.62%

9.13%

-3.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.80%

12.20%

-5.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.48%

17.36%

-6.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.43%

18.26%

-7.83%

PSFD vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSFD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSFD vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

PSFD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.98%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%
PSFD
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, PSFD and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ITOT has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to PSFD (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSFD dropped -14.94% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 5-year performance, ITOT leads with 12.69% vs 11.78% for PSFD. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, PSFD has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 12.69% return vs 11.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSFD.

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for PSFD.

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PSFD and 0.03% for ITOT.

PSFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSFD and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer