PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSFD vs. COWG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PSFD vs. COWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PSFD vs. COWG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PSFD
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF
-2.32%12.93%14.54%20.95%0.57%
COWG
Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
-4.15%10.24%34.99%20.69%-0.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSFD achieves a -2.32% return, which is significantly higher than COWG's -4.15% return.


PSFD

1D
2.04%
1M
-2.88%
YTD
-2.32%
6M
0.54%
1Y
12.46%
3Y*
12.99%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*

COWG

1D
2.89%
1M
-4.39%
YTD
-4.15%
6M
-6.87%
1Y
9.94%
3Y*
18.40%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PSFD vs. COWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSFD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than COWG's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PSFD vs. COWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSFD
PSFD Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PSFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSFD Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
PSFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSFD Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

COWG
COWG Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
COWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWG Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
COWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSFD vs. COWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSFDCOWGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.03

0.44

+0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

0.78

+0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.11

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

0.75

+0.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.58

2.44

+5.15

PSFD vs. COWG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSFD Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is higher than the COWG Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSFD and COWG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSFDCOWGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

0.44

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.93

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between PSFD and COWG is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PSFD vs. COWG - Dividend Comparison

PSFD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%.


TTM202520242023
PSFD
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COWG
Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
0.35%0.32%0.40%0.47%

Drawdowns

PSFD vs. COWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSFD drawdown since its inception was -14.94%, smaller than the maximum COWG drawdown of -23.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFD and COWG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PSFDCOWGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.94%

-23.60%

+8.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.86%

-12.96%

+4.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.96%

-8.21%

+4.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.07%

-3.35%

+1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

3.96%

-2.29%

Volatility

PSFD vs. COWG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD) is 3.87%, while Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that PSFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PSFDCOWGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.87%

6.09%

-2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.51%

13.24%

-7.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.12%

22.50%

-10.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.51%

19.34%

-8.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.54%

19.34%

-8.80%