PSET vs. NACP
PSET (Principal Quality ETF) and NACP (Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - PSET tracks the NASDAQ US Price Setters while NACP tracks the Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSET returned 9.03%/yr vs 16.01%/yr for NACP. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSET charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for NACP.
Performance
PSET vs. NACP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSET achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than NACP's 22.35% return.
PSET
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 0.01%
- 1Y
- 8.25%
- 3Y*
- 13.47%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
NACP
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 8.57%
- YTD
- 22.35%
- 6M
- 21.44%
- 1Y
- 44.11%
- 3Y*
- 27.38%
- 5Y*
- 16.01%
- 10Y*
- —
PSET vs. NACP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSET Principal Quality ETF | 0.31% | 7.27% | 17.65% | 24.07% | -16.52% | 29.59% | 16.20% | 34.85% | -8.05% |
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF | 22.35% | 21.38% | 23.93% | 29.69% | -23.05% | 27.62% | 26.00% | 30.74% | -8.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSET and NACP is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2018 | 0.77 |
The correlation between PSET and NACP shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSET vs. NACP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSET
NACP
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
PSET
NACP
Industrials
PSET
NACP
Financial Services
PSET
NACP
Healthcare
PSET
NACP
Communication Services
PSET
NACP
Consumer Cyclical
PSET
NACP
Basic Materials
PSET
NACP
Energy
PSET
NACP
Consumer Defensive
PSET
NACP
Real Estate
PSET
-
NACP
Utilities
PSET
-
NACP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSET vs. NACP — Risk / Return Rank
PSET
NACP
PSET vs. NACP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Quality ETF (PSET) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSET | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.54 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 4.59 | -3.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.16 | 20.18 | -18.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSET | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 3.16 | -2.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.92 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.93 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
PSET vs. NACP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSET drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, which is greater than NACP's maximum drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSET and NACP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSET | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.74% | -30.96% | -3.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.94% | -9.65% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.96% | -19.66% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.61% | -27.89% | +2.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.81% | 0.00% | -1.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.59% | -5.75% | +1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 2.19% | +1.63% |
Volatility
PSET vs. NACP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal Quality ETF (PSET) is 3.06%, while Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) has a volatility of 4.34%. This indicates that PSET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NACP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSET | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.06% | 4.34% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.70% | 11.13% | -1.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.66% | 14.02% | -1.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.51% | 17.47% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 18.69% | -0.64% |
PSET vs. NACP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSET has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NACP's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSET vs. NACP - Dividend Comparison
PSET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, more than NACP's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF | 0.55% | 0.62% | 2.96% | 1.28% | 3.48% | 3.06% | 1.48% | 1.22% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSET Principal Quality ETF | 0.62% | 0.59% | 0.69% | 0.85% | 1.47% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 1.52% | 1.33% | 1.02% | 1.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSET and NACP have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NACP has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to PSET (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSET dropped -34.74% vs NACP's -30.96%.
On 5-year performance, NACP leads with 16.01% vs 9.03% for PSET. On fees, PSET is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PSET has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NACP has performed better with a 16.01% return vs 9.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSET is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NACP.
PSET has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.55% for NACP.
PSET tracks NASDAQ US Price Setters, while NACP tracks Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. They also come from different issuers: Principal and Impact Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for PSET and 0.49% for NACP.
NACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSET and NACP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer