PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSET vs. ILCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSET vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Quality ETF (PSET) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSET achieves a -2.15% return, which is significantly lower than ILCG's 9.10% return. Over the past 10 years, PSET has underperformed ILCG with an annualized return of 12.55%, while ILCG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.09% annualized return.


PSET

1D
0.49%
1M
-1.25%
YTD
-2.15%
6M
-3.42%
1Y
4.23%
3Y*
11.59%
5Y*
8.13%
10Y*
12.55%

ILCG

1D
-0.11%
1M
-1.90%
YTD
9.10%
6M
7.52%
1Y
20.09%
3Y*
23.75%
5Y*
12.68%
10Y*
18.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSET vs. ILCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSET
Principal Quality ETF
-2.15%7.27%17.65%24.07%-16.52%29.59%16.20%34.85%-2.29%24.63%
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
9.10%16.71%32.82%40.41%-31.75%24.33%38.56%33.22%2.06%30.57%

Correlation

The correlation between PSET and ILCG is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2016

0.68

The correlation between PSET and ILCG shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSET vs. ILCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSET
ILCG

Technology

38.5%
53.1%

Industrials

19.0%
7.7%

Financial Services

13.8%
5.5%

Healthcare

10.8%
5.2%

Communication Services

6.6%
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.5%
10.1%

Basic Materials

3.3%
1.0%

Energy

1.4%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
1.4%

Real Estate

-

1.3%

Utilities

-

0.7%

Technology

PSET
38.5%
ILCG
53.1%

Industrials

PSET
19.0%
ILCG
7.7%

Financial Services

PSET
13.8%
ILCG
5.5%

Healthcare

PSET
10.8%
ILCG
5.2%

Communication Services

PSET
6.6%
ILCG
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

PSET
5.5%
ILCG
10.1%

Basic Materials

PSET
3.3%
ILCG
1.0%

Energy

PSET
1.4%
ILCG
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

PSET
1.1%
ILCG
1.4%

Real Estate

PSET

-

ILCG
1.3%

Utilities

PSET

-

ILCG
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSET vs. ILCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSET
PSET Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PSET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSET Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSET Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
PSET Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSET Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCG
ILCG Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ILCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCG Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCG Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSET vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Quality ETF (PSET) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSETILCGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.21

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.33

1.29

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.08

4.42

-3.34

PSET vs. ILCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSET Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the ILCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSET and ILCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSET vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSET drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, smaller than the maximum ILCG drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSET and ILCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSETILCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.74%

-52.98%

+18.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.94%

-15.65%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.96%

-23.10%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.61%

-35.38%

+9.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.74%

-35.38%

+0.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.22%

-5.68%

+1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.58%

-8.21%

+3.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

4.56%

-0.65%

Volatility

PSET vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Quality ETF (PSET) is 4.30%, while iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that PSET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSETILCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.30%

7.82%

-3.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.23%

14.46%

-4.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.93%

17.65%

-4.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.58%

22.22%

-4.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.10%

21.62%

-3.52%

PSET vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSET has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PSET vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison

PSET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, more than ILCG's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
0.42%0.47%0.50%0.69%0.75%0.34%0.28%0.54%0.81%0.89%0.95%0.99%
PSET
Principal Quality ETF
0.64%0.59%0.69%0.85%1.47%0.89%1.09%1.52%1.33%1.02%1.26%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSET and ILCG have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ILCG has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to PSET (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSET dropped -34.74% vs ILCG's -52.98%.

On 10-year performance, ILCG leads with 18.09% vs 12.55% for PSET. On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PSET has been the lower-risk option at 4.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ILCG has performed better with a 18.09% return vs 12.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for PSET.

PSET has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.42% for ILCG.

PSET tracks NASDAQ US Price Setters, while ILCG tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. They also come from different issuers: Principal and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for PSET and 0.04% for ILCG.

ILCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSET and ILCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer