PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSET vs. BTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSET vs. BTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Quality ETF (PSET) and Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PSET

1D
-0.77%
1M
2.67%
YTD
-0.49%
6M
-0.66%
1Y
7.57%
3Y*
12.93%
5Y*
8.86%
10Y*
12.73%

BTEC

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSET vs. BTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


PSET vs. BTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSET
BTEC

Technology

37.9%

-

Industrials

19.1%
0.6%

Financial Services

14.3%

-

Healthcare

10.8%
99.4%

Communication Services

6.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%

-

Basic Materials

3.3%

-

Energy

1.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.1%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

PSET
37.9%
BTEC

-

Industrials

PSET
19.1%
BTEC
0.6%

Financial Services

PSET
14.3%
BTEC

-

Healthcare

PSET
10.8%
BTEC
99.4%

Communication Services

PSET
6.7%
BTEC

-

Consumer Cyclical

PSET
5.4%
BTEC

-

Basic Materials

PSET
3.3%
BTEC

-

Energy

PSET
1.4%
BTEC

-

Consumer Defensive

PSET
1.1%
BTEC

-

Real Estate

PSET

-

BTEC

-

Utilities

PSET

-

BTEC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSET vs. BTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSET
PSET Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PSET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSET Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSET Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
PSET Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSET Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

BTEC
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSET vs. BTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Quality ETF (PSET) and Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSETBTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.98

PSET vs. BTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSETBTECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

Drawdowns

PSET vs. BTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSET drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, which is greater than BTEC's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSET and BTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSETBTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.74%

0.00%

-34.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.59%

0.00%

-2.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

0.00%

-4.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

Volatility

PSET vs. BTEC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSETBTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.67%

0.00%

+12.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.51%

0.00%

+17.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.06%

0.00%

+18.06%

PSET vs. BTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSET has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BTEC's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSET vs. BTEC - Dividend Comparison

PSET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, while BTEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BTEC
Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSET
Principal Quality ETF
0.63%0.59%0.69%0.85%1.47%0.89%1.09%1.52%1.33%1.02%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, PSET is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PSET is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BTEC.

PSET has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for BTEC.

PSET is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BTEC is Health & Biotech Equities. PSET tracks NASDAQ US Price Setters, while BTEC tracks NASDAQ U.S. Health Care Innovators Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for PSET and 0.42% for BTEC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSET and BTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer