PSECX vs. TMMAX
PSECX (1789 Growth and Income Fund) and TMMAX (SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PSECX returned 7.34%/yr vs 9.96%/yr for TMMAX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSECX charges 2.02%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for TMMAX.
Performance
PSECX vs. TMMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSECX achieves a 2.12% return, which is significantly lower than TMMAX's 3.01% return. Over the past 10 years, PSECX has underperformed TMMAX with an annualized return of 7.34%, while TMMAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.96% annualized return.
PSECX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- YTD
- 2.12%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- 6.01%
- 3Y*
- 11.60%
- 5Y*
- 7.09%
- 10Y*
- 7.34%
TMMAX
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- 3.01%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 8.00%
- 3Y*
- 11.95%
- 5Y*
- 9.35%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
PSECX vs. TMMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSECX 1789 Growth and Income Fund | 2.12% | 8.04% | 14.49% | 10.64% | -10.66% | 25.43% | 0.78% | 23.99% | -5.18% | 5.16% |
TMMAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund | 3.01% | 11.03% | 17.07% | 7.32% | -3.11% | 24.10% | 1.32% | 24.00% | -2.84% | 15.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSECX and TMMAX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2013 | 0.86 |
The correlation between PSECX and TMMAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSECX vs. TMMAX — Risk / Return Rank
PSECX
TMMAX
PSECX vs. TMMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSECX | TMMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.18 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 1.47 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.14 | 4.99 | -1.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSECX vs. TMMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSECX drawdown since its inception was -31.13%, smaller than the maximum TMMAX drawdown of -41.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSECX and TMMAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSECX | TMMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.13% | -41.50% | +10.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.44% | -5.78% | -1.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.51% | -23.00% | +10.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.47% | -23.00% | +4.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.13% | -33.41% | +2.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.54% | -8.13% | +4.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.87% | -5.57% | +1.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 1.69% | +0.45% |
Volatility
PSECX vs. TMMAX - Volatility Comparison
1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX) has a higher volatility of 3.01% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX) at 2.85%. This indicates that PSECX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSECX | TMMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | 2.85% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.73% | 6.20% | +1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.07% | 8.41% | +1.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.97% | 19.07% | -7.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.18% | 17.81% | -4.63% |
PSECX vs. TMMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSECX has a 2.02% expense ratio, which is higher than TMMAX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSECX vs. TMMAX - Dividend Comparison
PSECX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than TMMAX's 24.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSECX 1789 Growth and Income Fund | 0.99% | 0.85% | 3.88% | 2.71% | 4.60% | 1.53% | 0.27% | 1.16% | 6.78% | 0.59% | 0.31% | 5.12% |
TMMAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund | 24.56% | 25.19% | 23.39% | 15.23% | 6.54% | 4.73% | 2.15% | 3.67% | 4.91% | 4.10% | 4.17% | 5.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSECX and TMMAX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSECX has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to TMMAX (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSECX dropped -31.13% vs TMMAX's -41.50%.
TMMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSECX and TMMAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer