PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSCZX vs. PJFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSCZX vs. PJFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Small Company Fund Class Z (PSCZX) and PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCZX achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly higher than PJFAX's 9.23% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCZX has underperformed PJFAX with an annualized return of 12.77%, while PJFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.29% annualized return.


PSCZX

1D
1.01%
1M
2.64%
YTD
11.62%
6M
11.85%
1Y
25.86%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
6.80%
10Y*
12.77%

PJFAX

1D
-0.63%
1M
7.66%
YTD
9.23%
6M
7.87%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
29.27%
5Y*
15.31%
10Y*
20.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCZX vs. PJFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSCZX
PGIM Jennison Small Company Fund Class Z
11.62%7.29%16.22%11.85%-18.57%29.43%27.53%40.68%-13.42%19.81%
PJFAX
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund
9.23%14.53%48.10%52.76%-37.89%15.65%55.66%45.04%-1.24%36.41%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCZX and PJFAX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1997

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between PSCZX and PJFAX has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSCZX vs. PJFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCZX
PSCZX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PSCZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCZX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

PJFAX
PJFAX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PJFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PJFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCZX vs. PJFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Small Company Fund Class Z (PSCZX) and PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSCZXPJFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.24

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

1.24

+1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.97

3.95

+7.03

PSCZX vs. PJFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the PJFAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCZX and PJFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSCZXPJFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

1.35

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.62

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.85

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.52

-0.04

Drawdowns

PSCZX vs. PJFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCZX drawdown since its inception was -56.47%, smaller than the maximum PJFAX drawdown of -64.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCZX and PJFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCZXPJFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.47%

-64.07%

+7.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.83%

-17.76%

+7.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.25%

-24.05%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.08%

-43.56%

+15.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.40%

-43.56%

-3.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-0.63%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.06%

-20.35%

+10.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

5.55%

-3.07%

Volatility

PSCZX vs. PJFAX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Small Company Fund Class Z (PSCZX) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) at 3.85%. This indicates that PSCZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PJFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCZXPJFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

3.85%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.42%

12.34%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.44%

16.27%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.28%

24.70%

-4.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.13%

24.01%

-1.88%

PSCZX vs. PJFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCZX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than PJFAX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSCZX vs. PJFAX - Dividend Comparison

PSCZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.16%, less than PJFAX's 12.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PJFAX
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund
12.28%13.42%24.62%7.23%2.77%14.67%9.02%16.27%6.06%5.85%4.12%6.90%
PSCZX
PGIM Jennison Small Company Fund Class Z
6.16%6.87%4.72%0.50%3.67%31.87%13.30%16.41%19.48%7.97%5.32%14.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSCZX and PJFAX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSCZX has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to PJFAX (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCZX dropped -56.47% vs PJFAX's -64.07%.

PSCZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSCZX and PJFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer