PSCW vs. SRVR
PSCW (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF) and SRVR (Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCW is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Pacer, while SRVR is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. PSCW is actively managed, while SRVR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSCW returned 7.19%/yr vs -0.81%/yr for SRVR. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSCW charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SRVR.
Performance
PSCW vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCW achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly lower than SRVR's 19.79% return.
PSCW
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- YTD
- 7.49%
- 6M
- 8.21%
- 1Y
- 14.98%
- 3Y*
- 11.73%
- 5Y*
- 7.19%
- 10Y*
- —
SRVR
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 6M
- 20.69%
- 1Y
- 11.19%
- 3Y*
- 8.85%
- 5Y*
- -0.81%
- 10Y*
- —
PSCW vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCW Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF | 7.49% | 6.56% | 12.95% | 11.44% | -5.52% | 6.27% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 19.79% | -1.99% | 2.70% | 6.84% | -31.90% | 19.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCW and SRVR is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021 | 0.55 |
The correlation between PSCW and SRVR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSCW vs. SRVR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCW
SRVR
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PSCW
SRVR
Financial Services
PSCW
SRVR
Consumer Cyclical
PSCW
SRVR
-
Communication Services
PSCW
SRVR
Healthcare
PSCW
SRVR
-
Industrials
PSCW
SRVR
Consumer Defensive
PSCW
SRVR
-
Energy
PSCW
SRVR
Utilities
PSCW
SRVR
Real Estate
PSCW
SRVR
Basic Materials
PSCW
SRVR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCW vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank
PSCW
SRVR
PSCW vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF (PSCW) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSCW | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.84 | 0.67 | +3.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 6.45 | 1.05 | +5.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.90 | 1.13 | +0.78 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.05 | 0.76 | +9.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 51.44 | 1.64 | +49.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSCW | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.84 | 0.67 | +3.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | -0.04 | +0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 0.30 | +0.68 |
Drawdowns
PSCW vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCW drawdown since its inception was -11.89%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCW and SRVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCW | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.89% | -40.99% | +29.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.50% | -14.78% | +13.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.89% | -18.34% | +6.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.89% | -40.99% | +29.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -12.28% | +12.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.18% | -15.27% | +13.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.29% | 6.83% | -6.54% |
Volatility
PSCW vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF (PSCW) is 0.56%, while Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that PSCW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCW | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.56% | 5.47% | -4.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.48% | 13.12% | -10.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.92% | 16.72% | -12.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.64% | 19.71% | -12.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.59% | 21.44% | -13.85% |
PSCW vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCW has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than SRVR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCW vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison
PSCW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SRVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCW Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 2.70% | 2.67% | 2.00% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 1.61% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCW and SRVR have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRVR has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to PSCW (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCW dropped -11.89% vs SRVR's -40.99%.
On 5-year performance, PSCW leads with 7.19% vs -0.81% for SRVR. On fees, SRVR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PSCW has been the lower-risk option at 0.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PSCW has performed better with a 7.19% return vs -0.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SRVR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PSCW.
SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 0.00% for PSCW.
PSCW is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SRVR is REIT. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PSCW and 0.60% for SRVR.
PSCW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCW and SRVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer