PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSCW vs. SRVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSCW vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF (PSCW) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCW achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly lower than SRVR's 19.79% return.


PSCW

1D
-0.07%
1M
1.58%
YTD
7.49%
6M
8.21%
1Y
14.98%
3Y*
11.73%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*

SRVR

1D
-1.79%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
19.79%
6M
20.69%
1Y
11.19%
3Y*
8.85%
5Y*
-0.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCW vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PSCW
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF
7.49%6.56%12.95%11.44%-5.52%6.27%
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF
19.79%-1.99%2.70%6.84%-31.90%19.47%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCW and SRVR is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021

0.55

The correlation between PSCW and SRVR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSCW vs. SRVR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSCW
SRVR

Technology

34.7%
6.8%

Financial Services

13.6%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%

-

Communication Services

10.0%
7.5%

Healthcare

9.1%

-

Industrials

7.7%
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%

-

Energy

3.0%
3.8%

Utilities

2.4%
2.2%

Real Estate

2.0%
66.4%

Basic Materials

1.7%
0.8%

Technology

PSCW
34.7%
SRVR
6.8%

Financial Services

PSCW
13.6%
SRVR
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

PSCW
10.7%
SRVR

-

Communication Services

PSCW
10.0%
SRVR
7.5%

Healthcare

PSCW
9.1%
SRVR

-

Industrials

PSCW
7.7%
SRVR
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

PSCW
5.2%
SRVR

-

Energy

PSCW
3.0%
SRVR
3.8%

Utilities

PSCW
2.4%
SRVR
2.2%

Real Estate

PSCW
2.0%
SRVR
66.4%

Basic Materials

PSCW
1.7%
SRVR
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSCW vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCW
PSCW Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
PSCW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCW Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCW Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

SRVR
SRVR Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
SRVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRVR Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SRVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRVR Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCW vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF (PSCW) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSCWSRVRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.84

0.67

+3.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.45

1.05

+5.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.90

1.13

+0.78

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

10.05

0.76

+9.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

51.44

1.64

+49.80

PSCW vs. SRVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCW Sharpe Ratio is 3.84, which is higher than the SRVR Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCW and SRVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSCWSRVRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.84

0.67

+3.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

-0.04

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.30

+0.68

Drawdowns

PSCW vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCW drawdown since its inception was -11.89%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCW and SRVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCWSRVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.89%

-40.99%

+29.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.50%

-14.78%

+13.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.89%

-18.34%

+6.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.89%

-40.99%

+29.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-12.28%

+12.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.18%

-15.27%

+13.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.29%

6.83%

-6.54%

Volatility

PSCW vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF (PSCW) is 0.56%, while Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that PSCW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCWSRVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.56%

5.47%

-4.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.48%

13.12%

-10.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.92%

16.72%

-12.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.64%

19.71%

-12.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.59%

21.44%

-13.85%

PSCW vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCW has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than SRVR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSCW vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison

PSCW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SRVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PSCW
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF
2.70%2.67%2.00%3.69%1.70%1.19%1.59%1.61%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSCW and SRVR have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SRVR has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to PSCW (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCW dropped -11.89% vs SRVR's -40.99%.

On 5-year performance, PSCW leads with 7.19% vs -0.81% for SRVR. On fees, SRVR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PSCW has been the lower-risk option at 0.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PSCW has performed better with a 7.19% return vs -0.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SRVR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PSCW.

SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 0.00% for PSCW.

PSCW is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SRVR is REIT. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PSCW and 0.60% for SRVR.

PSCW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSCW and SRVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer