PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSCU vs. UTES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSCU vs. UTES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCU achieves a 12.29% return, which is significantly higher than UTES's 0.08% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCU has underperformed UTES with an annualized return of 5.81%, while UTES has yielded a comparatively higher 12.40% annualized return.


PSCU

1D
-2.32%
1M
-2.43%
YTD
12.29%
6M
10.22%
1Y
18.43%
3Y*
6.90%
5Y*
0.96%
10Y*
5.81%

UTES

1D
-0.98%
1M
-6.58%
YTD
0.08%
6M
-1.81%
1Y
7.86%
3Y*
22.78%
5Y*
15.66%
10Y*
12.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCU vs. UTES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSCU
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF
12.29%-1.93%10.68%2.12%-19.73%30.12%3.80%9.67%-4.80%12.42%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
0.08%25.71%45.35%-2.46%0.80%20.74%-0.30%25.48%5.14%14.21%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCU and UTES is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2015

0.47

The correlation between PSCU and UTES shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSCU vs. UTES - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSCU
UTES

Communication Services

56.7%

-

Utilities

31.9%
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

4.1%

-

Industrials

3.6%

-

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Technology

1.6%

-

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Communication Services

PSCU
56.7%
UTES

-

Utilities

PSCU
31.9%
UTES
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

PSCU
4.1%
UTES

-

Industrials

PSCU
3.6%
UTES

-

Real Estate

PSCU
2.0%
UTES

-

Technology

PSCU
1.6%
UTES

-

Financial Services

PSCU
0.0%
UTES

-

Basic Materials

PSCU

-

UTES

-

Consumer Defensive

PSCU

-

UTES

-

Energy

PSCU

-

UTES

-

Healthcare

PSCU

-

UTES

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSCU vs. UTES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCU
PSCU Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
PSCU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCU Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCU Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

UTES
UTES Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCU vs. UTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSCUUTESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.08

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

0.57

+1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.64

1.30

+4.35

PSCU vs. UTES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCU Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the UTES Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCU and UTES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSCUUTESDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

0.37

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.76

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.62

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.70

-0.22

Drawdowns

PSCU vs. UTES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCU drawdown since its inception was -29.97%, smaller than the maximum UTES drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCU and UTES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCUUTESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.97%

-35.39%

+5.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.32%

-13.88%

+5.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.55%

-17.62%

-5.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.97%

-20.40%

-9.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.97%

-35.39%

+5.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.46%

-9.26%

+5.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.67%

-5.52%

-2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

6.08%

-2.80%

Volatility

PSCU vs. UTES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU) is 5.04%, while Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) has a volatility of 7.40%. This indicates that PSCU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCUUTESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

7.40%

-2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.07%

16.95%

-5.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.81%

21.27%

-5.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.42%

20.60%

-2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.47%

20.16%

-0.69%

PSCU vs. UTES - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCU has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than UTES's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSCU vs. UTES - Dividend Comparison

PSCU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than UTES's 1.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSCU
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF
0.99%1.10%0.98%1.60%1.71%2.69%1.20%2.47%2.35%1.84%6.93%2.94%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
1.50%1.42%1.51%2.44%2.13%1.94%2.09%1.84%2.09%3.44%3.53%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSCU and UTES have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UTES has higher volatility (7.40%) compared to PSCU (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCU dropped -29.97% vs UTES's -35.39%.

On 10-year performance, UTES leads with 12.40% vs 5.81% for PSCU. On fees, PSCU is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PSCU has been the lower-risk option at 5.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UTES has performed better with a 12.40% return vs 5.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSCU is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for UTES.

UTES has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.99% for PSCU.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCU and 0.49% for UTES.

PSCU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSCU and UTES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer