PSCSX vs. TISBX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund (PSCSX) and TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX).
PSCSX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Mar 31, 2006. TISBX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Oct 1, 2002.
Performance
PSCSX vs. TISBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PSCSX vs. TISBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCSX PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund | -3.82% | 12.57% | 12.60% | 17.09% | -23.95% | 14.15% | 19.50% | 30.55% | -12.05% | 17.64% |
TISBX TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund | -2.48% | 12.72% | 11.60% | 17.07% | -20.31% | 14.85% | 20.14% | 25.61% | -10.99% | 13.14% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCSX achieves a -3.82% return, which is significantly lower than TISBX's -2.48% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PSCSX having a 9.82% annualized return and TISBX not far behind at 9.40%.
PSCSX
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -9.85%
- YTD
- -3.82%
- 6M
- -2.90%
- 1Y
- 18.76%
- 3Y*
- 11.68%
- 5Y*
- 1.92%
- 10Y*
- 9.82%
TISBX
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -8.16%
- YTD
- -2.48%
- 6M
- -0.39%
- 1Y
- 21.39%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- 3.13%
- 10Y*
- 9.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PSCSX vs. TISBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCSX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than TISBX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PSCSX vs. TISBX — Risk / Return Rank
PSCSX
TISBX
PSCSX vs. TISBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund (PSCSX) and TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSCSX | TISBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 0.91 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.20 | 1.39 | -0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.18 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 1.22 | -0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.69 | 4.66 | -0.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSCSX | TISBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 0.91 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.14 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.40 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.35 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCSX and TISBX is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PSCSX vs. TISBX - Dividend Comparison
PSCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than TISBX's 4.23% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCSX PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund | 4.35% | 5.63% | 4.34% | 2.36% | 26.32% | 19.21% | 5.69% | 8.77% | 12.86% | 5.84% | 3.41% | 8.45% |
TISBX TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund | 4.23% | 4.12% | 6.82% | 3.09% | 1.97% | 8.96% | 2.65% | 5.16% | 9.29% | 4.49% | 4.03% | 4.77% |
Drawdowns
PSCSX vs. TISBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCSX drawdown since its inception was -58.02%, roughly equal to the maximum TISBX drawdown of -56.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCSX and TISBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCSX | TISBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.02% | -56.50% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.12% | -13.90% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.03% | -31.89% | -3.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.15% | -41.69% | -4.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.21% | -10.95% | -1.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -9.74% | -0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 3.83% | +0.37% |
Volatility
PSCSX vs. TISBX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund (PSCSX) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX) at 6.56%. This indicates that PSCSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TISBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PSCSX | TISBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.13% | 6.56% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.00% | 14.13% | +0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.09% | 23.17% | +0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.39% | 22.53% | +0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.15% | 23.37% | +0.78% |