PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSCSX vs. SWSSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSCSX vs. SWSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund (PSCSX) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PSCSX having a 22.31% return and SWSSX slightly higher at 22.58%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PSCSX having a 11.92% annualized return and SWSSX not far behind at 11.61%.


PSCSX

1D
0.30%
1M
4.68%
6M
22.31%
YTD
22.31%
1Y
38.57%
3Y*
18.98%
5Y*
5.82%
10Y*
11.92%

SWSSX

1D
0.49%
1M
4.21%
6M
22.58%
YTD
22.58%
1Y
39.50%
3Y*
18.67%
5Y*
6.86%
10Y*
11.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCSX vs. SWSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSCSX
PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund
22.31%12.57%12.60%17.09%-23.95%14.15%19.50%30.55%-12.05%17.64%
SWSSX
Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares
22.58%12.88%11.57%17.07%-20.43%14.77%20.12%25.63%-11.19%14.76%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCSX and SWSSX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2006

0.98

The correlation between PSCSX and SWSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSCSX vs. SWSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCSX
PSCSX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PSCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SWSSX
SWSSX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SWSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SWSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCSX vs. SWSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund (PSCSX) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSCSXSWSSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.34

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

3.73

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.84

13.19

-1.35

PSCSX vs. SWSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the SWSSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCSX and SWSSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSCSX vs. SWSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCSX drawdown since its inception was -58.02%, roughly equal to the maximum SWSSX drawdown of -60.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCSX and SWSSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCSXSWSSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.02%

-60.34%

+2.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.21%

-11.00%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.03%

-27.50%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.03%

-31.93%

-3.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.15%

-41.81%

-4.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.18%

-10.70%

+0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

3.10%

+0.29%

Volatility

PSCSX vs. SWSSX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund (PSCSX) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX) at 6.20%. This indicates that PSCSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCSXSWSSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.56%

6.20%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.57%

14.28%

+1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.80%

19.59%

+1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.55%

22.67%

+0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.21%

24.07%

+0.14%

PSCSX vs. SWSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCSX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SWSSX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSCSX vs. SWSSX - Dividend Comparison

PSCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, more than SWSSX's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSCSX
PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund
3.50%5.63%4.34%2.36%26.32%19.21%5.69%8.77%12.86%5.84%3.41%8.45%
SWSSX
Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares
1.05%1.29%1.66%1.49%1.32%8.88%2.55%6.12%10.45%5.22%4.10%6.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, PSCSX and SWSSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PSCSX has higher volatility (6.56%) compared to SWSSX (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCSX dropped -58.02% vs SWSSX's -60.34%.

SWSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSCSX and SWSSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer