PSCSX vs. SWSSX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund (PSCSX) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX).
PSCSX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Mar 31, 2006. SWSSX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 19, 1997.
Performance
PSCSX vs. SWSSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PSCSX vs. SWSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCSX PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund | -3.82% | 12.57% | 12.60% | 17.09% | -23.95% | 14.15% | 19.50% | 30.55% | -12.05% | 17.64% |
SWSSX Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares | -2.49% | 12.88% | 11.57% | 17.07% | -20.43% | 14.77% | 20.12% | 25.63% | -11.19% | 14.76% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCSX achieves a -3.82% return, which is significantly lower than SWSSX's -2.49% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PSCSX having a 9.82% annualized return and SWSSX not far behind at 9.50%.
PSCSX
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -9.85%
- YTD
- -3.82%
- 6M
- -2.90%
- 1Y
- 18.76%
- 3Y*
- 11.68%
- 5Y*
- 1.92%
- 10Y*
- 9.82%
SWSSX
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -8.18%
- YTD
- -2.49%
- 6M
- -0.36%
- 1Y
- 21.55%
- 3Y*
- 11.83%
- 5Y*
- 3.10%
- 10Y*
- 9.50%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PSCSX vs. SWSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCSX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SWSSX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PSCSX vs. SWSSX — Risk / Return Rank
PSCSX
SWSSX
PSCSX vs. SWSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund (PSCSX) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSCSX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 0.91 | -0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.20 | 1.40 | -0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.18 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 1.33 | -0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.69 | 5.02 | -1.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSCSX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 0.91 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.14 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.40 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.33 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCSX and SWSSX is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PSCSX vs. SWSSX - Dividend Comparison
PSCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than SWSSX's 1.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCSX PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund | 4.35% | 5.63% | 4.34% | 2.36% | 26.32% | 19.21% | 5.69% | 8.77% | 12.86% | 5.84% | 3.41% | 8.45% |
SWSSX Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares | 1.32% | 1.29% | 1.66% | 1.49% | 1.32% | 8.88% | 2.55% | 6.12% | 10.45% | 5.22% | 4.10% | 6.92% |
Drawdowns
PSCSX vs. SWSSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCSX drawdown since its inception was -58.02%, roughly equal to the maximum SWSSX drawdown of -60.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCSX and SWSSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCSX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.02% | -60.34% | +2.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.12% | -13.90% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.03% | -31.93% | -3.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.15% | -41.81% | -4.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.21% | -11.00% | -1.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -10.78% | +0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 3.68% | +0.52% |
Volatility
PSCSX vs. SWSSX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund (PSCSX) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX) at 6.59%. This indicates that PSCSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PSCSX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.13% | 6.59% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.00% | 14.12% | +0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.09% | 23.11% | +0.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.39% | 22.57% | +0.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.15% | 24.03% | +0.12% |