PSCQ vs. GSG
PSCQ (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF) and GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCQ is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Pacer, while GSG is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. PSCQ is actively managed, while GSG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSCQ returned 12.06%/yr vs 14.13%/yr for GSG. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PSCQ charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GSG.
Performance
PSCQ vs. GSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCQ achieves a 6.57% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 38.94% return.
PSCQ
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 5.76%
- YTD
- 6.57%
- 1Y
- 12.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.18%
GSG
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 12.94%
- 6M
- 25.75%
- YTD
- 38.94%
- 1Y
- 42.34%
- 3Y*
- 14.13%
- 5Y*
- 14.47%
- 10Y*
- 8.91%
- ALL TIME*
- -2.13%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $16.60M | $17.31M | $26.52M | |
| $18.42K | $11.33K | $24.43K |
PSCQ vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCQ Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF | 6.57% | 11.50% | 9.72% | 19.79% | -4.44% | 2.38% |
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 38.94% | 5.93% | 8.52% | -5.51% | 24.08% | 1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCQ and GSG is -0.15, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021 | 0.08 |
The correlation between PSCQ and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCQ vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank
PSCQ
GSG
PSCQ vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF (PSCQ) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSCQ | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.29 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 2.16 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.68 | 6.99 | +5.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSCQ vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCQ drawdown since its inception was -9.92%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCQ and GSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCQ | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.92% | -89.62% | +79.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.58% | -18.81% | +14.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.92% | -18.81% | +8.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -58.05% | +58.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.54% | -63.67% | +62.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 5.84% | -4.91% |
Volatility
PSCQ vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF (PSCQ) is 1.58%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 8.11%. This indicates that PSCQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCQ | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.58% | 8.11% | -6.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.76% | 22.18% | -17.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.04% | 24.23% | -18.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.52% | 22.86% | -15.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.52% | 22.06% | -14.54% |
PSCQ vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCQ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCQ vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison
Neither PSCQ nor GSG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCQ and GSG have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSG has higher volatility (8.11%) compared to PSCQ (1.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCQ dropped -9.92% vs GSG's -89.62%.
On 3-year performance, GSG leads with 14.13% vs 12.06% for PSCQ. On fees, PSCQ is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PSCQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GSG has performed better with a 14.13% return vs 12.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSCQ is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.
PSCQ and GSG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PSCQ is categorized as Options Trading, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PSCQ and 0.75% for GSG.
PSCQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCQ and GSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer