PSCQ vs. FLRT
PSCQ (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF) and FLRT (Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCQ is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Pacer, while FLRT is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by Pacer. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSCQ returned 12.06%/yr vs 7.87%/yr for FLRT. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
PSCQ vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCQ achieves a 6.57% return, which is significantly higher than FLRT's 2.39% return.
PSCQ
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 5.76%
- YTD
- 6.57%
- 1Y
- 12.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.18%
FLRT
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 1Y
- 5.09%
- 3Y*
- 7.87%
- 5Y*
- 6.08%
- 10Y*
- 4.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.48%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.88M | $4.59M | $4.78M | |
| $18.42K | $11.33K | $24.43K |
PSCQ vs. FLRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCQ Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF | 6.57% | 11.50% | 9.72% | 19.79% | -4.44% | 2.38% |
FLRT Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF | 2.39% | 6.24% | 9.18% | 14.59% | -2.72% | 0.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCQ and FLRT is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021 | 0.31 |
The correlation between PSCQ and FLRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCQ vs. FLRT — Risk / Return Rank
PSCQ
FLRT
PSCQ vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF (PSCQ) and Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSCQ | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.76 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 2.89 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.68 | 10.59 | +2.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSCQ vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCQ drawdown since its inception was -9.92%, smaller than the maximum FLRT drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCQ and FLRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCQ | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.92% | -20.96% | +11.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.58% | -1.78% | -2.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.92% | -2.87% | -7.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -7.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.54% | -1.39% | -0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 0.48% | +0.45% |
Volatility
PSCQ vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF (PSCQ) has a higher volatility of 1.58% compared to Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF (FLRT) at 0.29%. This indicates that PSCQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCQ | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.58% | 0.29% | +1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.76% | 1.19% | +3.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.04% | 1.49% | +4.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.52% | 2.30% | +5.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.52% | 6.09% | +1.43% |
PSCQ vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PSCQ and FLRT have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
PSCQ vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison
PSCQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRT Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF | 6.72% | 6.93% | 7.93% | 8.40% | 5.81% | 3.16% | 3.52% | 4.30% | 3.95% | 3.20% | 3.38% | 3.21% |
PSCQ Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCQ and FLRT have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSCQ has higher volatility (1.58%) compared to FLRT (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCQ dropped -9.92% vs FLRT's -20.96%.
On 3-year performance, PSCQ leads with 12.06% vs 7.87% for FLRT. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, FLRT has been the lower-risk option at 0.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PSCQ has performed better with a 12.06% return vs 7.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSCQ and FLRT have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
FLRT has the higher dividend yield at 6.72%, compared with 0.00% for PSCQ.
PSCQ is categorized as Options Trading, while FLRT is Bank Loan.
FLRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCQ and FLRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer