PSCNX vs. SSCPX
PSCNX (Penn Capital Special Situations Small Cap Equity Fund) and SSCPX (Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PSCNX returned 13.80%/yr vs 12.10%/yr for SSCPX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSCNX charges 1.71%/yr vs 1.70%/yr for SSCPX.
Performance
PSCNX vs. SSCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCNX achieves a 24.83% return, which is significantly lower than SSCPX's 27.15% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCNX has outperformed SSCPX with an annualized return of 13.80%, while SSCPX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.10% annualized return.
PSCNX
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 5.41%
- YTD
- 24.83%
- 6M
- 22.74%
- 1Y
- 39.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.64%
- 5Y*
- 7.10%
- 10Y*
- 13.80%
SSCPX
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 8.20%
- YTD
- 27.15%
- 6M
- 23.90%
- 1Y
- 40.72%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.19%
- 10Y*
- 12.10%
PSCNX vs. SSCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCNX Penn Capital Special Situations Small Cap Equity Fund | 24.83% | 12.07% | 8.04% | 14.14% | -17.98% | 32.82% | 27.62% | 30.69% | -16.22% | 15.97% |
SSCPX Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio | 27.15% | 6.41% | 10.79% | 15.16% | -17.56% | 24.53% | 25.39% | 23.71% | -16.14% | 15.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCNX and SSCPX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2015 | 0.92 |
The correlation between PSCNX and SSCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCNX vs. SSCPX — Risk / Return Rank
PSCNX
SSCPX
PSCNX vs. SSCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Penn Capital Special Situations Small Cap Equity Fund (PSCNX) and Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSCNX | SSCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.35 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 3.67 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.04 | 12.49 | -0.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSCNX vs. SSCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCNX drawdown since its inception was -50.15%, smaller than the maximum SSCPX drawdown of -53.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCNX and SSCPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCNX | SSCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.15% | -53.65% | +3.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.47% | -11.54% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.88% | -27.78% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.09% | -27.78% | -4.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.15% | -43.59% | -6.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | 0.00% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.79% | -10.23% | +0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 3.39% | +0.03% |
Volatility
PSCNX vs. SSCPX - Volatility Comparison
Penn Capital Special Situations Small Cap Equity Fund (PSCNX) has a higher volatility of 6.90% compared to Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX) at 6.15%. This indicates that PSCNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCNX | SSCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.90% | 6.15% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.63% | 15.17% | +0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.24% | 20.28% | +0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.52% | 22.22% | +3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.96% | 23.05% | +2.91% |
PSCNX vs. SSCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCNX has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is higher than SSCPX's 1.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCNX vs. SSCPX - Dividend Comparison
PSCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.00%, less than SSCPX's 7.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCNX Penn Capital Special Situations Small Cap Equity Fund | 6.00% | 7.49% | 1.56% | 0.24% | 1.76% | 23.64% | 0.00% | 1.24% | 9.83% | 11.93% | 7.11% | 0.00% |
SSCPX Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio | 7.09% | 9.02% | 11.37% | 0.00% | 10.18% | 24.67% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 17.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 58.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, PSCNX and SSCPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PSCNX has higher volatility (6.90%) compared to SSCPX (6.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCNX dropped -50.15% vs SSCPX's -53.65%.
SSCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCNX and SSCPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer