PSCH vs. UNHW
PSCH (Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF) and UNHW (Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Health Care Index, while UNHW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill Investments. PSCH is passively managed, while UNHW is actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSCH charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for UNHW.
Performance
PSCH vs. UNHW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCH achieves a 19.98% return, which is significantly lower than UNHW's 32.80% return.
PSCH
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 10.61%
- 6M
- 18.53%
- YTD
- 19.98%
- 1Y
- 31.30%
- 3Y*
- 5.98%
- 5Y*
- -2.31%
- 10Y*
- 8.15%
UNHW
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- 6M
- 31.52%
- YTD
- 32.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCH vs. UNHW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PSCH Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF | 19.98% | -2.01% |
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF | 32.80% | 1.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCH and UNHW is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025 | 0.38 |
PSCH vs. UNHW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCH
UNHW
Healthcare
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
PSCH
UNHW
Technology
PSCH
UNHW
-
Financial Services
PSCH
UNHW
-
Industrials
PSCH
UNHW
-
Basic Materials
PSCH
-
UNHW
-
Communication Services
PSCH
-
UNHW
-
Consumer Cyclical
PSCH
-
UNHW
-
Consumer Defensive
PSCH
-
UNHW
-
Energy
PSCH
-
UNHW
-
Real Estate
PSCH
-
UNHW
-
Utilities
PSCH
-
UNHW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCH vs. UNHW — Risk / Return Rank
PSCH
UNHW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PSCH vs. UNHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSCH | UNHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.52 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSCH vs. UNHW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCH drawdown since its inception was -46.32%, which is greater than UNHW's maximum drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCH and UNHW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCH | UNHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.32% | -32.28% | -14.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.20% | -1.66% | -16.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.51% | -10.39% | -3.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.92% | — | — |
Volatility
PSCH vs. UNHW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCH | UNHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.42% | 47.35% | -26.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.97% | 47.35% | -24.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.63% | 47.35% | -23.72% |
PSCH vs. UNHW - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCH has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than UNHW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCH vs. UNHW - Dividend Comparison
PSCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than UNHW's 19.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCH Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF | 0.01% | 0.04% | 0.27% | 0.01% | 2.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% |
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF | 19.69% | 2.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCH and UNHW have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSCH is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSCH is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UNHW.
UNHW has the higher dividend yield at 19.69%, compared with 0.01% for PSCH.
PSCH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while UNHW is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCH and 0.99% for UNHW.
Find the right allocation for PSCH and UNHW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer