PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSCH vs. UNHW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSCH vs. UNHW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCH achieves a 14.38% return, which is significantly lower than UNHW's 25.93% return.


PSCH

1D
2.37%
1M
12.66%
YTD
14.38%
6M
9.05%
1Y
24.77%
3Y*
5.01%
5Y*
-4.85%
10Y*
8.44%

UNHW

1D
-0.88%
1M
5.69%
YTD
25.93%
6M
27.32%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCH vs. UNHW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PSCH
Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF
14.38%-2.01%
UNHW
Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF
25.93%1.54%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCH and UNHW is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025

0.35

PSCH vs. UNHW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSCH
UNHW

Healthcare

97.5%
29.0%

Technology

1.5%

-

Financial Services

0.9%

-

Industrials

0.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

PSCH
97.5%
UNHW
29.0%

Technology

PSCH
1.5%
UNHW

-

Financial Services

PSCH
0.9%
UNHW

-

Industrials

PSCH
0.7%
UNHW

-

Basic Materials

PSCH

-

UNHW

-

Communication Services

PSCH

-

UNHW

-

Consumer Cyclical

PSCH

-

UNHW

-

Consumer Defensive

PSCH

-

UNHW

-

Energy

PSCH

-

UNHW

-

Real Estate

PSCH

-

UNHW

-

Utilities

PSCH

-

UNHW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSCH vs. UNHW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCH
PSCH Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PSCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCH Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCH Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

UNHW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCH vs. UNHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSCHUNHWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.89

PSCH vs. UNHW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSCH vs. UNHW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCH drawdown since its inception was -46.32%, which is greater than UNHW's maximum drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCH and UNHW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCHUNHWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.32%

-32.28%

-14.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.01%

-1.32%

-20.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.50%

-11.25%

-2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.08%

Volatility

PSCH vs. UNHW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCHUNHWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.58%

48.46%

-27.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.96%

48.46%

-25.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.64%

48.46%

-24.82%

PSCH vs. UNHW - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCH has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than UNHW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSCH vs. UNHW - Dividend Comparison

PSCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than UNHW's 18.29% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PSCH
Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF
0.01%0.04%0.27%0.01%2.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%
UNHW
Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF
18.29%2.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSCH and UNHW have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PSCH is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PSCH is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UNHW.

UNHW has the higher dividend yield at 18.29%, compared with 0.01% for PSCH.

PSCH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while UNHW is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCH and 0.99% for UNHW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSCH and UNHW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer