PSCF vs. SPMO
PSCF (Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCF is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Financials Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSCF returned 6.80%/yr vs 20.95%/yr for SPMO. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSCF charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
PSCF vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCF achieves a 4.89% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 30.35% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCF has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 6.80%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.95% annualized return.
PSCF
- 1D
- -1.78%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 4.89%
- 6M
- 5.56%
- 1Y
- 16.72%
- 3Y*
- 15.40%
- 5Y*
- 2.81%
- 10Y*
- 6.80%
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 15.36%
- YTD
- 30.35%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 46.00%
- 3Y*
- 43.04%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- 20.95%
PSCF vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCF Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF | 4.89% | 6.19% | 15.50% | 6.02% | -19.34% | 27.82% | -9.07% | 23.13% | -8.43% | 6.71% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 30.35% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCF and SPMO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015 | 0.43 |
The correlation between PSCF and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSCF vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCF
SPMO
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
PSCF
SPMO
Real Estate
PSCF
SPMO
Technology
PSCF
SPMO
Industrials
PSCF
SPMO
Basic Materials
PSCF
-
SPMO
Communication Services
PSCF
-
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
PSCF
-
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
PSCF
-
SPMO
Energy
PSCF
-
SPMO
Healthcare
PSCF
-
SPMO
Utilities
PSCF
-
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCF vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
PSCF
SPMO
PSCF vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF (PSCF) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSCF | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 2.62 | -1.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | 3.54 | -2.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.47 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 3.64 | -1.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.50 | 14.17 | -9.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSCF | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 2.62 | -1.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 1.27 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 1.03 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 1.01 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
PSCF vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCF drawdown since its inception was -45.46%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCF and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCF | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.46% | -30.95% | -14.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.91% | -12.70% | +2.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.34% | -20.13% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.77% | -22.74% | -14.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.46% | -30.95% | -14.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.29% | 0.00% | -4.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.59% | -4.60% | -3.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.72% | 3.26% | +0.46% |
Volatility
PSCF vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF (PSCF) is 4.63%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that PSCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCF | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.63% | 7.35% | -2.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.58% | 14.39% | -2.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.42% | 17.64% | -0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.47% | 19.30% | +3.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.79% | 20.31% | +4.48% |
PSCF vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCF vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
PSCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, more than SPMO's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCF Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF | 2.42% | 2.09% | 2.48% | 3.32% | 2.93% | 1.83% | 3.57% | 4.27% | 4.21% | 2.26% | 3.01% | 2.37% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCF and SPMO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to PSCF (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCF dropped -45.46% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.95% vs 6.80% for PSCF. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, PSCF has been the lower-risk option at 4.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.95% return vs 6.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCF.
PSCF has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 0.65% for SPMO.
PSCF is categorized as Financials Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. PSCF tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Financials Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCF and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCF and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer