PSCE vs. SETM
PSCE (Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF) and SETM (Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - PSCE tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Energy Index while SETM tracks the Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials Select Index - AUD - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSCE returned 12.72%/yr vs 30.90%/yr for SETM. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSCE charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SETM.
Performance
PSCE vs. SETM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCE achieves a 42.33% return, which is significantly higher than SETM's 27.22% return.
PSCE
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- 42.33%
- 6M
- 34.80%
- 1Y
- 61.94%
- 3Y*
- 12.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.77%
- 10Y*
- -1.45%
SETM
- 1D
- -4.09%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- YTD
- 27.22%
- 6M
- 33.66%
- 1Y
- 144.21%
- 3Y*
- 30.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCE vs. SETM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCE Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF | 42.33% | -9.00% | -5.47% | 1.77% |
SETM Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF | 27.22% | 95.27% | -13.24% | -11.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCE and SETM is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PSCE and SETM has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PSCE vs. SETM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCE
SETM
Energy
Basic Materials
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
PSCE
SETM
Basic Materials
PSCE
SETM
Financial Services
PSCE
SETM
-
Communication Services
PSCE
-
SETM
-
Consumer Cyclical
PSCE
-
SETM
-
Consumer Defensive
PSCE
-
SETM
Healthcare
PSCE
-
SETM
-
Industrials
PSCE
-
SETM
Real Estate
PSCE
-
SETM
-
Technology
PSCE
-
SETM
Utilities
PSCE
-
SETM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCE vs. SETM — Risk / Return Rank
PSCE
SETM
PSCE vs. SETM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF (PSCE) and Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSCE | SETM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.44 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.61 | 5.61 | +1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.61 | 17.42 | -0.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSCE | SETM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 3.25 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 0.59 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
PSCE vs. SETM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCE drawdown since its inception was -96.21%, which is greater than SETM's maximum drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCE and SETM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCE | SETM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.21% | -42.81% | -53.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.41% | -25.85% | +16.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.57% | -42.81% | -1.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.71% | -7.30% | -67.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.83% | -14.26% | -44.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | 8.31% | -4.57% |
Volatility
PSCE vs. SETM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF (PSCE) is 7.96%, while Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) has a volatility of 13.58%. This indicates that PSCE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SETM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCE | SETM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.96% | 13.58% | -5.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.54% | 34.49% | -15.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.01% | 44.71% | -17.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.44% | 36.57% | +0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.26% | 36.57% | +6.69% |
PSCE vs. SETM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SETM's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCE vs. SETM - Dividend Comparison
PSCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, more than SETM's 1.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCE Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF | 1.84% | 2.39% | 1.70% | 2.57% | 1.70% | 0.46% | 0.87% | 0.14% | 0.22% | 0.04% | 0.22% | 0.82% |
SETM Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF | 1.23% | 1.56% | 2.07% | 2.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCE and SETM have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SETM has higher volatility (13.58%) compared to PSCE (7.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCE dropped -96.21% vs SETM's -42.81%.
On 3-year performance, SETM leads with 30.90% vs 12.72% for PSCE. On fees, PSCE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PSCE has been the lower-risk option at 7.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SETM has performed better with a 30.90% return vs 12.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSCE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SETM.
PSCE has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 1.23% for SETM.
PSCE tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Energy Index, while SETM tracks Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials Select Index - AUD - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCE and 0.65% for SETM.
SETM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCE and SETM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer