PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSCE vs. AMJB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSCE vs. AMJB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF (PSCE) and Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCE achieves a 32.45% return, which is significantly higher than AMJB's 11.92% return.


PSCE

1D
1.31%
1M
-9.77%
YTD
32.45%
6M
32.62%
1Y
40.46%
3Y*
10.33%
5Y*
8.83%
10Y*
-2.41%

AMJB

1D
-1.46%
1M
-9.62%
YTD
11.92%
6M
11.88%
1Y
9.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCE vs. AMJB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PSCE
Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF
32.45%-9.00%-2.36%
AMJB
Alerian MLP Index ETN
11.92%1.36%10.85%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCE and AMJB is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSCE vs. AMJB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCE
PSCE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
PSCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCE Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCE Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

AMJB
AMJB Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
AMJB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMJB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMJB Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
AMJB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMJB Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCE vs. AMJB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF (PSCE) and Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSCEAMJBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.11

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

0.81

+2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.94

2.55

+7.39

PSCE vs. AMJB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCE Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the AMJB Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCE and AMJB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSCE vs. AMJB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCE drawdown since its inception was -96.21%, which is greater than AMJB's maximum drawdown of -17.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCE and AMJB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCEAMJBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.21%

-17.70%

-78.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-11.80%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.47%

-10.66%

-65.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.87%

-5.02%

-53.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.15%

3.73%

+0.42%

Volatility

PSCE vs. AMJB - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF (PSCE) has a higher volatility of 8.87% compared to Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB) at 5.74%. This indicates that PSCE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMJB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCEAMJBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.87%

5.74%

+3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.98%

12.18%

+6.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.56%

15.68%

+11.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.40%

18.25%

+19.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.22%

18.25%

+24.97%

PSCE vs. AMJB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than AMJB's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSCE vs. AMJB - Dividend Comparison

PSCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, while AMJB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMJB
Alerian MLP Index ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSCE
Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF
2.72%2.39%1.70%2.57%1.70%0.46%0.87%0.14%0.22%0.04%0.22%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSCE and AMJB have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSCE has higher volatility (8.87%) compared to AMJB (5.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCE dropped -96.21% vs AMJB's -17.70%.

On 1-year performance, PSCE leads with 40.46% vs 9.47% for AMJB. On fees, PSCE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, AMJB has been the lower-risk option at 5.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PSCE has performed better with a 40.46% return vs 9.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSCE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for AMJB.

PSCE has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 0.00% for AMJB.

PSCE tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Energy Index, while AMJB tracks Alerian MLP Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCE and 0.85% for AMJB.

PSCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSCE and AMJB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer