PSC vs. BTEC
PSC (Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF) and BTEC (Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq US Small Cap Select Leaders TR Index, while BTEC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ U.S. Health Care Innovators Index. Both are passively managed. PSC charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BTEC.
Performance
PSC vs. BTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PSC
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 3.79%
- YTD
- 13.84%
- 6M
- 13.56%
- 1Y
- 27.15%
- 3Y*
- 18.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.06%
- 10Y*
- —
BTEC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSC vs. BTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PSC Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF | 7.68% |
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF | 0.00% |
PSC vs. BTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSC
BTEC
Technology
-
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
PSC
BTEC
-
Industrials
PSC
BTEC
Financial Services
PSC
BTEC
-
Healthcare
PSC
BTEC
Consumer Cyclical
PSC
BTEC
-
Energy
PSC
BTEC
-
Real Estate
PSC
BTEC
-
Basic Materials
PSC
BTEC
-
Utilities
PSC
BTEC
-
Consumer Defensive
PSC
BTEC
-
Communication Services
PSC
BTEC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSC vs. BTEC — Risk / Return Rank
PSC
BTEC
PSC vs. BTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) and Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSC | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.46 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.14 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.55 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSC | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | — | — |
Drawdowns
PSC vs. BTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSC drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, which is greater than BTEC's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSC and BTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSC | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.69% | 0.00% | -46.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | 0.00% | -0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.28% | 0.00% | -8.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | — | — |
Volatility
PSC vs. BTEC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSC | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.77% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.65% | 0.00% | +18.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.99% | 0.00% | +20.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.30% | 0.00% | +23.30% |
PSC vs. BTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than BTEC's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSC vs. BTEC - Dividend Comparison
PSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, while BTEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSC Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF | 0.58% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.73% | 1.92% | 1.45% | 1.25% | 1.47% | 1.30% | 0.95% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, PSC is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSC is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BTEC.
PSC has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.00% for BTEC.
PSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while BTEC is Health & Biotech Equities. PSC tracks Nasdaq US Small Cap Select Leaders TR Index, while BTEC tracks NASDAQ U.S. Health Care Innovators Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for PSC and 0.42% for BTEC.
Find the right allocation for PSC and BTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer