PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSC vs. BITI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSC vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSC achieves a 18.31% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 27.11% return.


PSC

1D
-0.58%
1M
-1.08%
6M
13.74%
YTD
18.31%
1Y
31.90%
3Y*
16.31%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.86%

BITI

1D
3.01%
1M
-2.58%
6M
22.77%
YTD
27.11%
1Y
58.64%
3Y*
-31.77%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-35.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$24.10M$26.49M$38.71M
$6.70M$7.59M$7.79M

PSC vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PSC
Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF
18.31%13.41%12.38%18.51%6.55%
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
27.11%-1.76%-62.60%-66.17%3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between PSC and BITI is -0.44, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022

-0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSC vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PSC
PSC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSC Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
PSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSC Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

BITI
BITI Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PSC vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSCBITIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.24

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

2.53

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.41

6.17

+4.24

PSC vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSC and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSC vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSC drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSC and BITI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCBITIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.69%

-92.16%

+45.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.95%

-25.28%

+15.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.49%

-84.63%

+61.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.78%

-86.12%

+83.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.17%

-68.59%

+60.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

10.35%

-7.51%

Volatility

PSC vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) is 3.84%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 9.13%. This indicates that PSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCBITIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

9.13%

-5.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.31%

33.31%

-20.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.77%

44.23%

-25.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.88%

52.03%

-31.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.19%

52.03%

-28.84%

PSC vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSC vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

PSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than BITI's 15.30% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
15.17%1.60%3.91%3.33%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSC
Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF
0.53%0.67%0.75%0.73%1.92%1.45%1.25%1.47%1.30%0.95%0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSC and BITI have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITI has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to PSC (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSC dropped -46.69% vs BITI's -92.16%.

On 3-year performance, PSC leads with 16.31% vs -31.77% for BITI. On fees, PSC is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, PSC has been the lower-risk option at 3.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PSC has performed better with a 16.31% return vs -31.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSC is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.17%, compared with 0.53% for PSC.

PSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. PSC tracks Nasdaq US Small Cap Select Leaders TR Index, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: Principal and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for PSC and 1.03% for BITI.

PSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSC and BITI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer