PSBMX vs. PTDIX
PSBMX (Principal SmallCap Fund) and PTDIX (Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund) are both mutual funds - PSBMX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Principal, while PTDIX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Principal. Over the past 10 years, PSBMX returned 11.08%/yr vs 10.85%/yr for PTDIX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSBMX charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for PTDIX.
Performance
PSBMX vs. PTDIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSBMX achieves a 16.25% return, which is significantly higher than PTDIX's 6.96% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PSBMX having a 11.08% annualized return and PTDIX not far behind at 10.85%.
PSBMX
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 4.99%
- YTD
- 16.25%
- 6M
- 13.89%
- 1Y
- 35.33%
- 3Y*
- 16.05%
- 5Y*
- 5.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.08%
PTDIX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- YTD
- 6.96%
- 6M
- 6.54%
- 1Y
- 17.41%
- 3Y*
- 16.53%
- 5Y*
- 8.04%
- 10Y*
- 10.85%
PSBMX vs. PTDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSBMX Principal SmallCap Fund | 16.25% | 14.58% | 8.53% | 15.11% | -20.51% | 19.21% | 21.44% | 26.97% | -11.42% | 12.35% |
PTDIX Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund | 6.96% | 15.59% | 17.43% | 18.33% | -18.13% | 15.35% | 16.04% | 24.91% | -7.95% | 20.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSBMX and PTDIX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2001 | 0.90 |
The correlation between PSBMX and PTDIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSBMX vs. PTDIX — Risk / Return Rank
PSBMX
PTDIX
PSBMX vs. PTDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal SmallCap Fund (PSBMX) and Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSBMX | PTDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.33 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 2.51 | +0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.97 | 10.92 | +1.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSBMX vs. PTDIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSBMX drawdown since its inception was -60.15%, which is greater than PTDIX's maximum drawdown of -54.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSBMX and PTDIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSBMX | PTDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.15% | -54.38% | -5.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.10% | -7.32% | -4.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.13% | -13.05% | -12.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.32% | -25.43% | -5.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.04% | -30.02% | -12.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.78% | +0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.76% | -7.48% | -3.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 1.68% | +1.40% |
Volatility
PSBMX vs. PTDIX - Volatility Comparison
Principal SmallCap Fund (PSBMX) has a higher volatility of 5.46% compared to Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX) at 3.96%. This indicates that PSBMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSBMX | PTDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 3.96% | +1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.91% | 8.55% | +5.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.10% | 10.39% | +7.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.09% | 13.58% | +8.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 13.86% | +8.55% |
PSBMX vs. PTDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSBMX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than PTDIX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSBMX vs. PTDIX - Dividend Comparison
PSBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, less than PTDIX's 9.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSBMX Principal SmallCap Fund | 4.80% | 5.58% | 3.66% | 2.91% | 0.00% | 7.82% | 2.28% | 5.83% | 16.72% | 8.65% | 2.29% | 3.80% |
PTDIX Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund | 9.16% | 9.80% | 12.28% | 4.40% | 8.61% | 8.92% | 6.01% | 7.26% | 9.28% | 6.07% | 4.86% | 6.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSBMX and PTDIX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSBMX has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to PTDIX (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSBMX dropped -60.15% vs PTDIX's -54.38%.
PSBMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSBMX and PTDIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer