PSAIX vs. PCN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PSAIX (PIMCO Global Advantage Strategy Bond Fund) and PCN (PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - PSAIX is a Global Bonds fund managed by PIMCO, while PCN is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by PIMCO. Over the past 10 years, PSAIX returned 3.49%/yr vs 7.26%/yr for PCN. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSAIX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for PCN.

Performance

PSAIX vs. PCN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Global Advantage Strategy Bond Fund (PSAIX) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSAIX achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly higher than PCN's -3.06% return. Over the past 10 years, PSAIX has underperformed PCN with an annualized return of 3.49%, while PCN has yielded a comparatively higher 7.26% annualized return.

PSAIX

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: 0.12%
• 6M: 0.63%
• 1Y: 5.39%
• 3Y*: 5.93%
• 5Y*: 1.82%
• 10Y*: 3.49%

PCN

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -0.74%
• YTD: -3.06%
• 6M: -1.10%
• 1Y: 2.84%
• 3Y*: 7.52%
• 5Y*: 0.90%
• 10Y*: 7.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSAIX vs. PCN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PSAIX PIMCO Global Advantage Strategy Bond Fund	0.12%	8.87%	3.21%	7.91%	-11.07%	1.11%	7.76%	8.94%	-0.60%	7.86%
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund	-3.06%	5.55%	19.52%	16.22%	-22.88%	6.93%	-2.19%	39.10%	-5.94%	26.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PSAIX and PCN is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2009	0.21

Over the past year, PSAIX and PCN have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

PSAIX vs. PCN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSAIX

PSAIX Risk / Return Rank: 21
PSAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
PSAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
PSAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
PSAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
PSAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

PCN

PCN Risk / Return Rank: 4
PCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
PCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
PCN Omega Ratio Rank: 5
PCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
PCN Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSAIX vs. PCN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Global Advantage Strategy Bond Fund (PSAIX) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSAIX	PCN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	0.29	+1.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	0.49	+1.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.07	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.25	0.27	+0.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.17	0.80	+3.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSAIX vs. PCN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the PCN Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSAIX and PCN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSAIX	PCN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.34	0.29	+1.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	0.06	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96	0.33	+0.63
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	0.39	+0.45

Drawdowns

PSAIX vs. PCN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSAIX drawdown since its inception was -15.35%, smaller than the maximum PCN drawdown of -61.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSAIX and PCN.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSAIX	PCN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.35%	-61.12%	+45.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.61%	-10.40%	+5.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.61%	-22.53%	+17.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.35%	-33.39%	+18.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-15.35%	-50.27%	+34.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.97%	-5.59%	+3.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.31%	-7.20%	+3.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.37%	3.57%	-2.20%

Volatility

PSAIX vs. PCN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Global Advantage Strategy Bond Fund (PSAIX) is 1.72%, while PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that PSAIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSAIX	PCN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.72%	2.77%	-1.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.78%	7.11%	-3.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.27%	9.70%	-5.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.98%	16.19%	-12.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.67%	21.94%	-18.27%

PSAIX vs. PCN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSAIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than PCN's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSAIX vs. PCN - Dividend Comparison

PSAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than PCN's 11.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund	11.42%	10.58%	10.06%	10.88%	12.66%	7.89%	7.83%	7.37%	9.60%	7.85%	11.98%	10.22%
PSAIX PIMCO Global Advantage Strategy Bond Fund	4.30%	4.22%	3.66%	3.14%	4.10%	4.61%	2.20%	2.79%	2.43%	1.83%	2.03%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSAIX and PCN in my portfolio?

PSAIX and PCN have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSAIX or PCN?

PCN has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to PSAIX (1.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSAIX dropped -15.35% vs PCN's -61.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.