PRXV vs. ILCV
PRXV (Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF) and ILCV (iShares Morningstar Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. PRXV is actively managed, while ILCV is passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRXV charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for ILCV.
Performance
PRXV vs. ILCV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PRXV
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILCV
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 2.80%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- YTD
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 24.89%
- 3Y*
- 18.18%
- 5Y*
- 12.12%
- 10Y*
- 11.59%
PRXV vs. ILCV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF | 8.29% |
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF | 6.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRXV and ILCV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2026 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRXV vs. ILCV — Risk / Return Rank
PRXV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ILCV
PRXV vs. ILCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRXV | ILCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.45 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.75 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.33 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRXV vs. ILCV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRXV drawdown since its inception was -1.41%, smaller than the maximum ILCV drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRXV and ILCV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRXV | ILCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.41% | -58.63% | +57.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.23% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.38% | -9.28% | +8.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.60% | — |
Volatility
PRXV vs. ILCV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRXV | ILCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.28% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.18% | 10.00% | +0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.18% | 14.19% | -4.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.18% | 16.62% | -6.44% |
PRXV vs. ILCV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRXV has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRXV vs. ILCV - Dividend Comparison
PRXV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than ILCV's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF | 1.58% | 1.77% | 1.99% | 2.27% | 2.32% | 2.01% | 2.96% | 2.70% | 2.93% | 2.32% | 2.76% | 3.01% |
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRXV and ILCV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ILCV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ILCV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for PRXV.
ILCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.38% for PRXV.
They also come from different issuers: Praxis and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for PRXV and 0.04% for ILCV.
Find the right allocation for PRXV and ILCV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer