PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRXV vs. FUNL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRXV vs. FUNL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV) and CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PRXV

1D
-0.03%
1M
4.27%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FUNL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
5.66%
6M
7.22%
1Y
18.97%
3Y*
16.53%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRXV vs. FUNL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRXV vs. FUNL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRXV

FUNL
FUNL Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FUNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUNL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FUNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUNL Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRXV vs. FUNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV) and CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PRXV vs. FUNL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRXVFUNLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.54

0.95

+3.59

Drawdowns

PRXV vs. FUNL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRXV drawdown since its inception was -1.18%, smaller than the maximum FUNL drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRXV and FUNL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRXVFUNLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.18%

-19.35%

+18.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-0.12%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.32%

-3.54%

+3.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

Volatility

PRXV vs. FUNL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRXVFUNLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.66%

8.82%

+0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.66%

15.16%

-5.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.66%

15.29%

-5.63%

PRXV vs. FUNL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRXV has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FUNL's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRXV vs. FUNL - Dividend Comparison

PRXV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FUNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
FUNL
CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL
2.25%2.10%1.78%1.69%1.84%1.55%0.45%
PRXV
Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, PRXV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRXV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FUNL.

FUNL has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 0.00% for PRXV.

They also come from different issuers: Praxis and CornerCap. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for PRXV and 0.50% for FUNL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRXV and FUNL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer