PRXV vs. CBSE
PRXV (Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF) and CBSE (Clough Select Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRXV charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for CBSE.
Performance
PRXV vs. CBSE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PRXV
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBSE
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 10.89%
- YTD
- 32.18%
- 6M
- 29.85%
- 1Y
- 51.66%
- 3Y*
- 31.65%
- 5Y*
- 12.52%
- 10Y*
- —
PRXV vs. CBSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF | 4.51% |
CBSE Clough Select Equity ETF | 13.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRXV and CBSE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRXV vs. CBSE — Risk / Return Rank
PRXV
CBSE
PRXV vs. CBSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV) and Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRXV | CBSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.54 | 0.80 | +3.74 |
Drawdowns
PRXV vs. CBSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRXV drawdown since its inception was -1.18%, smaller than the maximum CBSE drawdown of -36.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRXV and CBSE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRXV | CBSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.18% | -36.30% | +35.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -0.93% | +0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.32% | -12.31% | +11.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.47% | — |
Volatility
PRXV vs. CBSE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRXV | CBSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.80% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.66% | 22.55% | -12.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.66% | 24.06% | -14.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.66% | 23.79% | -14.13% |
PRXV vs. CBSE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRXV has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than CBSE's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRXV vs. CBSE - Dividend Comparison
PRXV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBSE Clough Select Equity ETF | 0.26% | 0.35% | 0.37% | 1.50% | 0.52% |
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRXV and CBSE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRXV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRXV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for CBSE.
CBSE has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.00% for PRXV.
They also come from different issuers: Praxis and Clough. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for PRXV and 0.85% for CBSE.
Find the right allocation for PRXV and CBSE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer