PRXCX vs. CMF
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price California Tax Free Bond Fund (PRXCX) and iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF).
PRXCX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Sep 14, 1986. CMF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P California AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. It was launched on Oct 4, 2007.
Performance
PRXCX vs. CMF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRXCX vs. CMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRXCX T. Rowe Price California Tax Free Bond Fund | -0.18% | 5.51% | 2.75% | 7.64% | -9.93% | 2.68% | 4.39% | 7.31% | 0.75% | 5.54% |
CMF iShares California Muni Bond ETF | -0.57% | 3.36% | 1.65% | 5.71% | -8.27% | 0.78% | 4.50% | 6.94% | 0.99% | 4.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRXCX achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly higher than CMF's -0.57% return. Over the past 10 years, PRXCX has outperformed CMF with an annualized return of 2.34%, while CMF has yielded a comparatively lower 1.72% annualized return.
PRXCX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -2.75%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 2.28%
- 1Y
- 6.23%
- 3Y*
- 4.16%
- 5Y*
- 1.51%
- 10Y*
- 2.34%
CMF
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -2.42%
- YTD
- -0.57%
- 6M
- 1.16%
- 1Y
- 4.10%
- 3Y*
- 2.44%
- 5Y*
- 0.58%
- 10Y*
- 1.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRXCX vs. CMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRXCX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than CMF's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRXCX vs. CMF — Risk / Return Rank
PRXCX
CMF
PRXCX vs. CMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price California Tax Free Bond Fund (PRXCX) and iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRXCX | CMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 0.92 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.61 | 1.15 | +0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.23 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 1.13 | +0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.09 | 3.54 | +0.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRXCX | CMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 0.92 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.14 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.34 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.39 | +0.70 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRXCX and CMF is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PRXCX vs. CMF - Dividend Comparison
PRXCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.41%, more than CMF's 2.98% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRXCX T. Rowe Price California Tax Free Bond Fund | 6.41% | 6.00% | 3.26% | 3.50% | 2.21% | 2.82% | 2.80% | 2.94% | 3.11% | 3.09% | 3.33% | 3.42% |
CMF iShares California Muni Bond ETF | 2.98% | 2.94% | 2.78% | 2.29% | 1.91% | 1.58% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.17% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 2.55% |
Drawdowns
PRXCX vs. CMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRXCX drawdown since its inception was -21.67%, which is greater than CMF's maximum drawdown of -16.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRXCX and CMF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRXCX | CMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.67% | -16.45% | -5.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.56% | -3.84% | -1.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.41% | -12.45% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.41% | -14.57% | -0.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | -2.42% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.78% | -4.80% | +2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 1.23% | +0.49% |
Volatility
PRXCX vs. CMF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price California Tax Free Bond Fund (PRXCX) is 1.23%, while iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF) has a volatility of 1.56%. This indicates that PRXCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRXCX | CMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 1.56% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.06% | 2.00% | +0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.63% | 4.48% | +1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.38% | 4.17% | +0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.12% | 5.07% | -0.95% |