CMF vs. FCTFX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF) and Fidelity California Municipal Income Fund (FCTFX).
CMF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P California AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. It was launched on Oct 4, 2007. FCTFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 7, 1984.
Performance
CMF vs. FCTFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CMF vs. FCTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMF iShares California Muni Bond ETF | -0.57% | 3.36% | 1.65% | 5.71% | -8.27% | 0.78% | 4.50% | 6.94% | 0.99% | 4.63% |
FCTFX Fidelity California Municipal Income Fund | -1.07% | 5.75% | 1.89% | 6.53% | -9.64% | 1.39% | 4.50% | 7.63% | 0.68% | 5.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMF achieves a -0.57% return, which is significantly higher than FCTFX's -1.07% return. Over the past 10 years, CMF has underperformed FCTFX with an annualized return of 1.72%, while FCTFX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.02% annualized return.
CMF
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -2.42%
- YTD
- -0.57%
- 6M
- 1.16%
- 1Y
- 4.10%
- 3Y*
- 2.44%
- 5Y*
- 0.58%
- 10Y*
- 1.72%
FCTFX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -3.26%
- YTD
- -1.07%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 4.27%
- 3Y*
- 3.38%
- 5Y*
- 0.96%
- 10Y*
- 2.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CMF vs. FCTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMF has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FCTFX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CMF vs. FCTFX — Risk / Return Rank
CMF
FCTFX
CMF vs. FCTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF) and Fidelity California Municipal Income Fund (FCTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMF | FCTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 1.04 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.15 | 1.40 | -0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.29 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 1.08 | +0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.54 | 3.87 | -0.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMF | FCTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 1.04 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.25 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.50 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 1.12 | -0.74 |
Correlation
The correlation between CMF and FCTFX is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CMF vs. FCTFX - Dividend Comparison
CMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, which matches FCTFX's 3.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMF iShares California Muni Bond ETF | 2.98% | 2.94% | 2.78% | 2.29% | 1.91% | 1.58% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.17% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 2.55% |
FCTFX Fidelity California Municipal Income Fund | 3.01% | 3.86% | 2.85% | 2.67% | 1.67% | 2.28% | 2.79% | 2.84% | 3.01% | 3.53% | 3.52% | 3.03% |
Drawdowns
CMF vs. FCTFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMF drawdown since its inception was -16.45%, smaller than the maximum FCTFX drawdown of -23.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMF and FCTFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMF | FCTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.45% | -23.20% | +6.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.84% | -5.00% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.45% | -14.01% | +1.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.57% | -14.01% | -0.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.42% | -3.26% | +0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.80% | -2.44% | -2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.23% | 1.39% | -0.16% |
Volatility
CMF vs. FCTFX - Volatility Comparison
iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF) has a higher volatility of 1.56% compared to Fidelity California Municipal Income Fund (FCTFX) at 1.17%. This indicates that CMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CMF | FCTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.56% | 1.17% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.00% | 1.77% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.48% | 4.99% | -0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.17% | 3.92% | +0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.07% | 4.04% | +1.03% |