PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRWCX vs. FSENX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRWCX vs. FSENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRWCX achieves a 5.76% return, which is significantly lower than FSENX's 35.02% return. Over the past 10 years, PRWCX has outperformed FSENX with an annualized return of 11.25%, while FSENX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.68% annualized return.


PRWCX

1D
-0.26%
1M
2.52%
YTD
5.76%
6M
5.87%
1Y
14.88%
3Y*
13.48%
5Y*
8.87%
10Y*
11.25%

FSENX

1D
1.38%
1M
-2.65%
YTD
35.02%
6M
31.99%
1Y
51.42%
3Y*
19.21%
5Y*
22.08%
10Y*
9.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRWCX vs. FSENX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRWCX
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund
5.76%12.45%12.50%18.85%-12.00%18.45%18.13%24.62%0.63%15.34%
FSENX
Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio
35.02%10.56%4.26%0.94%62.98%55.31%-32.51%9.90%-24.94%-2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between PRWCX and FSENX is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1987

0.57

The correlation between PRWCX and FSENX shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRWCX vs. FSENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRWCX
PRWCX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
PRWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
PRWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FSENX
FSENX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FSENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSENX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FSENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSENX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRWCX vs. FSENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRWCXFSENXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.43

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

5.42

-2.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.72

15.96

-5.24

PRWCX vs. FSENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRWCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the FSENX Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRWCX and FSENX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRWCXFSENXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

2.74

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.81

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.31

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.32

+0.59

Drawdowns

PRWCX vs. FSENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRWCX drawdown since its inception was -41.77%, smaller than the maximum FSENX drawdown of -76.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRWCX and FSENX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRWCXFSENXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.77%

-76.24%

+34.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.32%

-9.95%

+3.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.96%

-25.85%

+9.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.07%

-28.02%

+10.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.86%

-72.11%

+45.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-5.09%

+4.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.33%

-17.01%

+13.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

3.37%

-1.93%

Volatility

PRWCX vs. FSENX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX) is 1.92%, while Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) has a volatility of 7.60%. This indicates that PRWCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRWCXFSENXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.92%

7.60%

-5.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.04%

15.35%

-9.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.45%

19.70%

-12.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.74%

27.26%

-14.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.74%

30.96%

-18.22%

PRWCX vs. FSENX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRWCX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than FSENX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRWCX vs. FSENX - Dividend Comparison

PRWCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.33%, more than FSENX's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSENX
Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio
1.59%1.95%1.95%1.98%2.50%2.25%3.43%1.84%1.48%1.74%0.62%1.29%
PRWCX
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund
8.33%8.81%10.38%4.15%9.44%9.23%7.97%5.83%7.46%6.82%3.51%9.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRWCX and FSENX have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSENX has higher volatility (7.60%) compared to PRWCX (1.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRWCX dropped -41.77% vs FSENX's -76.24%.

FSENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRWCX and FSENX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer