PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRVBX vs. HFMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRVBX vs. HFMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Permanent Portfolio Versatile Bond Portfolio (PRVBX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund (HFMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRVBX achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly lower than HFMDX's 18.54% return. Over the past 10 years, PRVBX has underperformed HFMDX with an annualized return of 4.29%, while HFMDX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.88% annualized return.


PRVBX

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.00%
6M
1.13%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
5.63%
5Y*
2.61%
10Y*
4.29%

HFMDX

1D
0.59%
1M
5.00%
YTD
18.54%
6M
16.28%
1Y
26.60%
3Y*
24.20%
5Y*
17.22%
10Y*
14.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRVBX vs. HFMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRVBX
Permanent Portfolio Versatile Bond Portfolio
1.00%5.66%5.78%6.91%-5.91%2.93%9.88%9.29%2.01%0.69%
HFMDX
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund
18.54%2.68%34.13%30.83%2.72%27.23%23.37%15.76%-23.52%20.71%

Correlation

The correlation between PRVBX and HFMDX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2004

0.03

Over the past year, PRVBX and HFMDX have become more correlated (0.38) than their long-term average of 0.03, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRVBX vs. HFMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRVBX
PRVBX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
PRVBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRVBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRVBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PRVBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRVBX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

HFMDX
HFMDX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
HFMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
HFMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRVBX vs. HFMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Permanent Portfolio Versatile Bond Portfolio (PRVBX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund (HFMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRVBXHFMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.22

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

2.17

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.97

7.25

+4.71

PRVBX vs. HFMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRVBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the HFMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRVBX and HFMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRVBX vs. HFMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRVBX drawdown since its inception was -16.91%, smaller than the maximum HFMDX drawdown of -61.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRVBX and HFMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRVBXHFMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.91%

-61.25%

+44.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.51%

-12.66%

+11.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.51%

-27.76%

+26.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.22%

-27.76%

+19.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.91%

-56.14%

+39.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-0.73%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.72%

-12.22%

+11.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.39%

3.79%

-3.40%

Volatility

PRVBX vs. HFMDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Permanent Portfolio Versatile Bond Portfolio (PRVBX) is 0.66%, while Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund (HFMDX) has a volatility of 7.31%. This indicates that PRVBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRVBXHFMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.66%

7.31%

-6.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.45%

16.51%

-15.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80%

22.06%

-20.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.36%

23.42%

-21.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.36%

25.15%

-20.79%

PRVBX vs. HFMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRVBX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than HFMDX's 1.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRVBX vs. HFMDX - Dividend Comparison

PRVBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, more than HFMDX's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFMDX
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund
0.61%0.72%18.84%9.61%21.66%1.73%0.00%0.00%40.95%18.56%0.64%0.91%
PRVBX
Permanent Portfolio Versatile Bond Portfolio
4.14%4.18%3.61%3.16%1.83%0.85%4.73%2.51%1.71%3.30%3.27%5.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRVBX and HFMDX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFMDX has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to PRVBX (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRVBX dropped -16.91% vs HFMDX's -61.25%.

PRVBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRVBX and HFMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer