PRUK.L vs. BNKE.L
PRUK.L (Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)) and BNKE.L (Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - PRUK.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while BNKE.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PRUK.L returned 0.76%/yr vs 29.25%/yr for BNKE.L. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PRUK.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for BNKE.L.
Performance
PRUK.L vs. BNKE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PRUK.L is traded in GBp, while BNKE.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the BNKE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRUK.L achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than BNKE.L's 4.63% return.
PRUK.L
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 5.16%
- 1Y
- 9.91%
- 3Y*
- 8.92%
- 5Y*
- 0.76%
- 10Y*
- —
BNKE.L
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 6.68%
- YTD
- 4.63%
- 6M
- 11.03%
- 1Y
- 45.15%
- 3Y*
- 46.04%
- 5Y*
- 29.25%
- 10Y*
- —
PRUK.L vs. BNKE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRUK.L Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 2.88% | 13.57% | 5.85% | 7.37% | -22.76% | 12.69% | 22.98% |
BNKE.L Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc | 4.63% | 99.94% | 25.19% | 27.75% | 6.62% | 31.33% | 14.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRUK.L and BNKE.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020 | 0.50 |
The correlation between PRUK.L and BNKE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
PRUK.L vs. BNKE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PRUK.L
BNKE.L
Industrials
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
PRUK.L
BNKE.L
-
Financial Services
PRUK.L
BNKE.L
Consumer Cyclical
PRUK.L
BNKE.L
-
Real Estate
PRUK.L
BNKE.L
-
Basic Materials
PRUK.L
BNKE.L
-
Technology
PRUK.L
BNKE.L
-
Communication Services
PRUK.L
BNKE.L
-
Consumer Defensive
PRUK.L
BNKE.L
-
Utilities
PRUK.L
BNKE.L
-
Energy
PRUK.L
BNKE.L
-
Healthcare
PRUK.L
BNKE.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRUK.L vs. BNKE.L — Risk / Return Rank
PRUK.L
BNKE.L
PRUK.L vs. BNKE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L) and Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (BNKE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRUK.L | BNKE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.32 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 2.70 | -1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.52 | 8.72 | -6.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRUK.L | BNKE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 1.93 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 1.15 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.75 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
PRUK.L vs. BNKE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRUK.L drawdown since its inception was -36.10%, smaller than the maximum BNKE.L drawdown of -48.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRUK.L and BNKE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRUK.L | BNKE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.10% | -48.52% | +12.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.05% | -16.66% | +3.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.00% | -18.40% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.10% | -34.21% | -1.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.76% | -1.62% | -2.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.80% | -10.40% | -4.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.93% | 5.17% | -1.24% |
Volatility
PRUK.L vs. BNKE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L) is 4.82%, while Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (BNKE.L) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that PRUK.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNKE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRUK.L | BNKE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | 6.10% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.72% | 18.62% | -6.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.14% | 23.28% | -9.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 25.45% | -8.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 29.62% | -12.17% |
PRUK.L vs. BNKE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRUK.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BNKE.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRUK.L vs. BNKE.L - Dividend Comparison
PRUK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, while BNKE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNKE.L Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRUK.L Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 3.60% | 3.70% | 3.63% | 3.43% | 3.50% | 1.73% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRUK.L and BNKE.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRUK.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRUK.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for BNKE.L.
PRUK.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while BNKE.L is Financials Equities. PRUK.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while BNKE.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PRUK.L and 0.30% for BNKE.L.
Find the right allocation for PRUK.L and BNKE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer