PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRUK.L vs. ANXU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRUK.L vs. ANXU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PRUK.L is traded in GBp, while ANXU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ANXU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRUK.L achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than ANXU.L's 20.95% return.


PRUK.L

1D
1.00%
1M
3.43%
YTD
2.88%
6M
5.16%
1Y
9.91%
3Y*
8.92%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*

ANXU.L

1D
0.00%
1M
10.24%
YTD
20.95%
6M
19.24%
1Y
42.83%
3Y*
25.22%
5Y*
19.21%
10Y*
22.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRUK.L vs. ANXU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PRUK.L
Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)
2.88%13.57%5.85%7.37%-22.76%12.69%22.98%
ANXU.L
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD
20.15%11.32%28.95%48.68%-25.30%28.68%15.76%

Correlation

The correlation between PRUK.L and ANXU.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020

0.45

PRUK.L vs. ANXU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRUK.L
ANXU.L

Industrials

22.2%
3.1%

Financial Services

19.9%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

13.2%
12.2%

Real Estate

8.0%
0.1%

Basic Materials

7.3%
1.1%

Technology

7.0%
53.7%

Communication Services

6.8%
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
7.7%

Utilities

3.4%
1.4%

Energy

2.9%
0.6%

Healthcare

2.9%
4.2%

Industrials

PRUK.L
22.2%
ANXU.L
3.1%

Financial Services

PRUK.L
19.9%
ANXU.L
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

PRUK.L
13.2%
ANXU.L
12.2%

Real Estate

PRUK.L
8.0%
ANXU.L
0.1%

Basic Materials

PRUK.L
7.3%
ANXU.L
1.1%

Technology

PRUK.L
7.0%
ANXU.L
53.7%

Communication Services

PRUK.L
6.8%
ANXU.L
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

PRUK.L
6.4%
ANXU.L
7.7%

Utilities

PRUK.L
3.4%
ANXU.L
1.4%

Energy

PRUK.L
2.9%
ANXU.L
0.6%

Healthcare

PRUK.L
2.9%
ANXU.L
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRUK.L vs. ANXU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRUK.L
PRUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
PRUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

ANXU.L
ANXU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ANXU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRUK.L vs. ANXU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRUK.LANXU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.47

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

3.83

-3.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.52

10.84

-8.32

PRUK.L vs. ANXU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRUK.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the ANXU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRUK.L and ANXU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRUK.LANXU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

2.68

-1.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.96

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

1.30

-0.92

Drawdowns

PRUK.L vs. ANXU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRUK.L drawdown since its inception was -36.10%, which is greater than ANXU.L's maximum drawdown of -27.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRUK.L and ANXU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRUK.LANXU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.10%

-27.52%

-8.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.05%

-11.12%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.00%

-24.28%

+6.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.10%

-27.52%

-8.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.76%

0.00%

-3.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.80%

-4.99%

-9.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.93%

3.94%

-0.01%

Volatility

PRUK.L vs. ANXU.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) have volatilities of 4.82% and 5.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRUK.LANXU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

5.02%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.72%

11.74%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.14%

15.89%

-1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.54%

20.08%

-3.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.45%

21.15%

-3.70%

PRUK.L vs. ANXU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRUK.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ANXU.L's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PRUK.L vs. ANXU.L - Dividend Comparison

PRUK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, while ANXU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ANXU.L
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRUK.L
Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)
3.60%3.70%3.63%3.43%3.50%1.73%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRUK.L and ANXU.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRUK.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRUK.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for ANXU.L.

PRUK.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while ANXU.L is Nasdaq-100. PRUK.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while ANXU.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PRUK.L and 0.13% for ANXU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRUK.L and ANXU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer