PRUK.L vs. ANXU.L
PRUK.L (Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)) and ANXU.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) are both exchange-traded funds - PRUK.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while ANXU.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PRUK.L returned 0.76%/yr vs 19.21%/yr for ANXU.L. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PRUK.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for ANXU.L.
Performance
PRUK.L vs. ANXU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PRUK.L is traded in GBp, while ANXU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ANXU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRUK.L achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than ANXU.L's 20.95% return.
PRUK.L
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 5.16%
- 1Y
- 9.91%
- 3Y*
- 8.92%
- 5Y*
- 0.76%
- 10Y*
- —
ANXU.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 10.24%
- YTD
- 20.95%
- 6M
- 19.24%
- 1Y
- 42.83%
- 3Y*
- 25.22%
- 5Y*
- 19.21%
- 10Y*
- 22.69%
PRUK.L vs. ANXU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRUK.L Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 2.88% | 13.57% | 5.85% | 7.37% | -22.76% | 12.69% | 22.98% |
ANXU.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 20.15% | 11.32% | 28.95% | 48.68% | -25.30% | 28.68% | 15.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRUK.L and ANXU.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020 | 0.45 |
PRUK.L vs. ANXU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PRUK.L
ANXU.L
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Healthcare
Industrials
PRUK.L
ANXU.L
Financial Services
PRUK.L
ANXU.L
Consumer Cyclical
PRUK.L
ANXU.L
Real Estate
PRUK.L
ANXU.L
Basic Materials
PRUK.L
ANXU.L
Technology
PRUK.L
ANXU.L
Communication Services
PRUK.L
ANXU.L
Consumer Defensive
PRUK.L
ANXU.L
Utilities
PRUK.L
ANXU.L
Energy
PRUK.L
ANXU.L
Healthcare
PRUK.L
ANXU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRUK.L vs. ANXU.L — Risk / Return Rank
PRUK.L
ANXU.L
PRUK.L vs. ANXU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRUK.L | ANXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.47 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 3.83 | -3.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.52 | 10.84 | -8.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRUK.L | ANXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 2.68 | -1.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.96 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 1.30 | -0.92 |
Drawdowns
PRUK.L vs. ANXU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRUK.L drawdown since its inception was -36.10%, which is greater than ANXU.L's maximum drawdown of -27.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRUK.L and ANXU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRUK.L | ANXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.10% | -27.52% | -8.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.05% | -11.12% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.00% | -24.28% | +6.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.10% | -27.52% | -8.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.76% | 0.00% | -3.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.80% | -4.99% | -9.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.93% | 3.94% | -0.01% |
Volatility
PRUK.L vs. ANXU.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) have volatilities of 4.82% and 5.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRUK.L | ANXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | 5.02% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.72% | 11.74% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.14% | 15.89% | -1.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 20.08% | -3.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 21.15% | -3.70% |
PRUK.L vs. ANXU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRUK.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ANXU.L's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PRUK.L vs. ANXU.L - Dividend Comparison
PRUK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, while ANXU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANXU.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRUK.L Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 3.60% | 3.70% | 3.63% | 3.43% | 3.50% | 1.73% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRUK.L and ANXU.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRUK.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRUK.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for ANXU.L.
PRUK.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while ANXU.L is Nasdaq-100. PRUK.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while ANXU.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PRUK.L and 0.13% for ANXU.L.
Find the right allocation for PRUK.L and ANXU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer