PRTO vs. TACK
PRTO (RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF) and TACK (Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRTO charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for TACK.
Performance
PRTO vs. TACK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PRTO
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TACK
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 5.73%
- 6M
- 6.10%
- 1Y
- 14.32%
- 3Y*
- 11.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRTO vs. TACK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PRTO RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF | 10.84% |
TACK Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund | 3.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRTO and TACK is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRTO vs. TACK — Risk / Return Rank
PRTO
TACK
PRTO vs. TACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF (PRTO) and Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRTO | TACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.07 | 0.63 | +4.43 |
Drawdowns
PRTO vs. TACK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRTO drawdown since its inception was -2.98%, smaller than the maximum TACK drawdown of -14.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRTO and TACK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRTO | TACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.98% | -14.49% | +11.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.39% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.54% | -4.23% | +3.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.86% | — |
Volatility
PRTO vs. TACK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRTO | TACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.45% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.91% | 9.49% | +4.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 11.24% | +2.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 11.24% | +2.67% |
PRTO vs. TACK - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRTO has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than TACK's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRTO vs. TACK - Dividend Comparison
PRTO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRTO RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TACK Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund | 1.20% | 1.18% | 1.26% | 1.29% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRTO and TACK have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TACK is cheaper at 0.76% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TACK is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for PRTO.
TACK has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.00% for PRTO.
They also come from different issuers: Tidal and Fairlead. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for PRTO and 0.76% for TACK.
Find the right allocation for PRTO and TACK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer